Jut like BO and his tripe.
Trump *has* to impose a ban without Congress, since they intend to sabotage his every promise just because..
Ryan intends to elevate Ryan. Ryan will be ever so busy making an advance run for 2020, as soon as TRUMP were to be elected. Like Cruz, like Hillary, putting together a machine full of money can get you a long way, long before the election comes around.
Posturing and pony tricks come first. Then bang, you think you should be president.
TRUMP will survive only on Executive Orders spent on UN-doing everything Obama pulled off with EO’s.
Congress will thwart TRUMP’s every move, in order to paralyze his presidency so they can convincingly dump him in 2020.
This is why TRUMP’s VP choice matters, very much.
So someone in the press actually read Title 8 of US code.
One good executive order deserves another???
Why not?
Trump has a phone and he has a pen.
Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
When Obama can enact de facto amnesty by telling immigration courts to issue 3-4 year waivers, then Trump can enact a Muslim immigration ban simply by saying loyalty to a religion that seeks to overthrow the government to replace it with a theocratic state (over 1/4 of American born Muslims agree per Pew polls).
Back in 2015, CBS interviewed a Constitutional scholar who said he could do it and the Supreme Court would 50-50 odds support it.
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/legal-scholar-trump-s-muslim-ban-may-be-constitutional-n484981
Back in 2015, a liberal law scholar said he could do it.
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/legal-scholar-trump-s-muslim-ban-may-be-constitutional-n484981
Summary:
* we banned communists and marxists from immigrating, due to viewpoints, and it was upheld because First Amendment protections don’t apply to immigrants seeking to come
* if Islam is classified as a group seeking to overthrow the government, it is allowed under national security guidelines
Islam is the only religion with the concept of jihad.Liberals and other apologists advocating not profiling muslims for immigration purposes go with the PC narrative that Mohammed meant jihad as “personal struggle” while those with no PC agenda and an IQ above room temperature refer to the inconvenient facts that Mohammed in the seventh century was responsible for the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of nonbelievers under the banner of jihad. Although Islamic practitioners today who believe in the 7th century version of jihad may be a small minority, they are significant enough in numbers to create collective and individual havoc on a consistent and worldwide basis. Orlando, Boston, San Bernadino and New York are testimony that this country can do with a little less “personal struggle” storyline and a lot more profiled scrutiny when it comes to immigration control.
Hey if obozo could do it in 2011 then Trump could kick it in high gear day 1 hopefully
I read up on the immigration statutes and Trump can pretty do what he wants which is likely why Ryan and company are having a hissy fit. They can’t stop him.
One would think all Trump need do is order ICE to begin enforcing the laws.
They act like they’re telling a dirty secret - Trump already stated that a President had that power and where Obama refuses, he would use it....
THE LAW IS ALREADY ON THE BOOKS....
section 215(a) (1) of the Act of June 27, 1952 (8 USC 1185), to prescribe limitations and exceptions on the rules and regulations governing the entry of aliens into the United States
this is what peanut head used to crack down on iranians...
TRUMP CAN DECLARE IT A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY AND APPLY THE LAW....
besides, it would be tied up in the courts long enough to take additional action, etc etc etc...