Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/15/2016 6:13:52 PM PDT by asinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: asinclair

The Republic is collapsing under the immorality of a non Christian electorate


2 posted on 05/15/2016 6:17:21 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof, but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

Hillary claimed to be “Unelected co-president”. She served on the panel to overhaul/nationalize healthcare.

I raised this issue in 2008. She said then that she would let him sit in on meetings on a variety of issues.

So does he get any more years as ‘co-president’?


3 posted on 05/15/2016 6:17:27 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Obama is more supportive of Iran's right to defend its territorial borders than he is of the USA's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

WJC cannot serve as VP due to the constitutional restriction of serving more than 2 terms as president. (10 years is possible for the elevation of a VP to POTUS).

HRC has no such constitutional prohibition as considering a 1st Lady as equivalent to POTUS is ridiculous.

Having said that, I’d love to see Hitlary run over by a subway train.


4 posted on 05/15/2016 6:20:08 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

Yes, she is eligible under that consideration. She is wholly unfit and a traitor and a murderer. Felons may not be president. Therefore she is ineligible.


5 posted on 05/15/2016 6:20:11 PM PDT by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

It’s a real loop hole. So I think you got nothing. An interesting nothing.

It does remind us though there ought to be some legislation started and defining this further and instituting laws in regards to co-mingling of leadership from spouses.


6 posted on 05/15/2016 6:21:50 PM PDT by Fhios (Going Donald Trump is as close to going John Galt as we'll get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair
A good point but the woman belongs in prison for treason and gross dereliction of duty that cost American lives and we can't even get that done. Our government has become a uniparty criminal operation.
7 posted on 05/15/2016 6:25:34 PM PDT by Aria (2016: The gravy train v Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

Of all the potential issues w Hillary, I don’t think this will stick and it’s a waste of time.

Focus on things that will resonate with people, such as refusing to support and save our ambassador in Benghazi.


8 posted on 05/15/2016 6:27:02 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

...Is HRC eligible under the 22nd Amendment?....
Unfortunately, any way it’s looked at, yes.

However, high crimes and misdemeanors are another matter.


9 posted on 05/15/2016 6:29:36 PM PDT by Sasparilla (Hillary for Prison 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

If this ever gets in the way of a presidency, she’ll divorce Bill between the words “Twenty-Second” and “Amendment”.

Hell, she’ll have him killed.


11 posted on 05/15/2016 6:31:20 PM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

Who with an IQ above temperature and not in a mental institution has suggested Bill as Hillary’s VP?


12 posted on 05/15/2016 6:38:18 PM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

So, taking your premise to the extreme:

If a spouse commits murder are both guilty of the same crime or an attached crime by virtue of your “Single Person” premise?

GTFOH


13 posted on 05/15/2016 6:41:45 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

According to the first definition in Black’s Law Dictionary she is not. To be eligible for president you must be a PERSON.

From Black’s definition of PERSON:

“A MAN considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes.”

Unfortunately, it then goes on to reference Bouvier’s Law Dictionary of 1856:

“A human being considered as capable of having rights and of being charged with duties; while a “thing” is the object over which rights may be exercised.”

Going to the Bouvier dictionary, that has additional info:

“This word is applied to men, women and children, who are called natural persons.”

NOTE: The good news above is that transgenders and hermaphrodites are EXCLUDED from the Presidency!!!

“But when the word “Persons” is spoken of in legislative acts, natural persons will be intended, unless something appear in the context to show that it applies to artificial persons. “

Artificial persons being corporations. If you want to include “marriage” as a type of artificial person because it is a “partnership” in estate and common law, since the candidacy for presidency refers to natural persons by the quote above, a spouse would be eligible as a distinct natural person.


14 posted on 05/15/2016 6:47:30 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

This doesn’t matter... She’s gonna lose the general and she’s gonna lose BIG!


16 posted on 05/15/2016 6:58:45 PM PDT by Bullish (Face it, insanity is just not presidential.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

Sorry, but legally a non-starter. In fact, he could run for VP, and she ceased to be able to be Pres, he would elevate to that position.

No person shall be ELECTED to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.


21 posted on 05/15/2016 7:24:21 PM PDT by Strac6 (The primaries are only the semi-finals. ALL THAT MATTERS IS DEFEATING HILLARY IN NOVEMBER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

Hillary is actually precluded from holding any office of trust because of the classified emails. Nowhere in the statute does it say that she has to be convicted. Only the fact that she did it. Or more precisely: didn’t do it correctly.


24 posted on 05/15/2016 7:28:46 PM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

Good luck with challenging that in Roberts’s court.


27 posted on 05/15/2016 8:08:27 PM PDT by murron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

After running against Trump, Hillary will wish she had been ineligible. ;-)


28 posted on 05/15/2016 8:12:26 PM PDT by r_barton (GO TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair

She would just get divorced. These things have no consequences for Klinton.


31 posted on 05/15/2016 11:45:19 PM PDT by vpintheak (Freedom is not equality; and equality is not freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: asinclair
Consider that a married couple is, for many legal purposes, a "single individual."

Don't make it up as you go along. That's what Progressives do.

The Constitution contains nothing about married couples, thank you very much!

32 posted on 05/15/2016 11:55:06 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson