Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MD Expat in PA

I am so sorry for what happened

This crime is not about people using bathrooms.

I keep asking with no answer forth coming how do you enforce such a law?

If someone is dressed like a woman enters a bathroom and uses the facilities and leaves what is there to do? If a crime is committed regardless of dress then I hope it is a CCW location


10 posted on 04/22/2016 1:06:51 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nifster
If someone is dressed like a woman enters a bathroom...

Part of the problem is that how the person dresses doesn't really matter.

A man who looks like a man, and dresses like a man, and acts like a man, can now decide on the spur of the moment that he's a mentally a woman. And so he can follow some little girl into the woman's room.

13 posted on 04/22/2016 1:14:00 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Nifster
I keep asking with no answer forth coming how do you enforce such a law. If someone is dressed like a woman enters a bathroom and uses the facilities and leaves what is there to do? If a crime is committed regardless of dress then I hope it is a CCW location

As I already said, no one is proposing “bathroom police”. It is absolutely impractical to do a “penis check” or asking for a BC from everyone entering a public bathroom so in that respect is “unenforceable”. And I dare say that if someone, a trannie like say looking like Ru Paul went into a Lady’s room, most would not bat an eyelash. And if Ru Paul hit on you at a bar after a few drinks, you might have a “Lola” story to tell.

That’s not the point.

The law came in response to a Charlotte City Council ordinance mandating that all public facilities should allow people to use the bathroom or locker room corresponding to their “gender identity”. The North Carolina statute overturned the rule, stating that public accommodation policy can only be established at the state level.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/trump-scolded-on-n-c-bathroom-bill-you-got-key-fact-wrong/

My point was and is that if anyone of any gender can use the bathroom of his/her/shims/its choice, the prosecution of any sexual assaults becomes more difficult to prove. If a man being in a women’s rest room is not on its self at all suspicious or out of the ordinary. It removes the “motive” out of the equation.

19 posted on 04/22/2016 1:37:24 PM PDT by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Nifster

The clear and evident answer is to continue to have the power of law to drag the pervert out of the restroom they are invading, not allowing them to freely invade them without consequences.


32 posted on 04/22/2016 5:57:34 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson