Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Well, this supports what I’ve been saying all along.

The delegate pool consists of what is essentially a random sampling of all potential voters. If the population of potential voters supports 44% Trump, 34% Cruz, 17% Kasich, 5% other, and then a random sampling from that population should contain supporters roughly equal to those percentages (within statistical error). There is no way a random sampling from such a population would contain nothing but Cruz or undecided voters.

If an outcome is so far different than the statistical prediction, then something untoward happened. There is no other possibility.

The good thing is that Trump knows when to take advantage of opportunities, and he used this to good effect: witness New York!


5 posted on 04/22/2016 4:28:49 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom; Gaffer; hoosiermama; LucyT; onyx; Jane Long; Amntn; nikos1121; NIKK

Everyone in politics and all the voting analysts recognize a sham election.

The owners of the GreenPapers, a nonpartisan website, see the sham. On the Colorado page they show Cruz running unopposed with NO VOTE COUNT.

There are no other democrat or republican page that has ever looked like this on GP.

See the sham——>

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/CO-R

Cruz, Rafael Edward “Ted 34Delegates 100.00% 34 91.89% 381.08%

NO OTHER CANDIDATES LISTED!

The entire Colorado republican voting population chose Ted.

Can someone reproduce the GP CO here for the thread, please.

This is like a Cuban election (pun intended.) Our Cubano-Candian-Texan, Fidelito, had himself a Cuban election:

Nacional Cubano el Presidente Election results:

Castro, Fidel -——100% votes
Others————— 00000000

Stat0 Colorado el Presidente Election results:

Cruz, Fidelito———100% votes
Others-—————0000000000


12 posted on 04/22/2016 4:53:26 AM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom
There is no way a random sampling from such a population would contain nothing but Cruz or undecided voters.

Like Hillary and her 6 coin toss wins in a row.

14 posted on 04/22/2016 4:55:37 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom
If an outcome is so far different than the statistical prediction, then something untoward happened. There is no other possibility.
The good thing is that Trump knows when to take advantage of opportunities...

You're right. This completely backfired on the GOPe and Cruz. They may have won the battle (for a few delegates) but they took a big step towards losing the war. It was so egregious it was obviously an artificial manipulation worthy of a North Korean or Iraqi dictator. They lost far more base, support, and trust than any comparable handful of delegates. Greedy, strategic idiots. Good riddance. I used to be on the fence, thinking either Trump or Cruz. No longer.

30 posted on 04/22/2016 5:57:29 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson