Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: I would never tell Loretta Lynch what to do on the Hillary investigation
Canada Free Press ^ | 04/12/16 | Dan Calabrese

Posted on 04/12/2016 9:34:21 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

Obama doesn't have to speak directly to Loretta Lynch to make sure she knows

What I’ve embedded here is Obama’s entire 15-minute interview with Chris Wallace from Sunday, which covers a lot of other topics, including Obama’s attitude toward terrorism and the status of the Merrick Garland nomination. The Hillary e-mail part doesn’t start until around the 10-minute mark, This is where Obama insists - and leaves no room for ambiguity - that he never talks to the DOJ or the FBI about criminal investigations and never tells them what to do, because no one is above the law.

Now that’s a pretty strong and unmistakable statement. Is it possible that it was a bold-faced lie? There’s no way to know for sure, but my guess is that it’s techically true but designed to mislead. In other words, it’s the sort of thing we used to call a Clinton Truth.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: fbi; hillaryclinton; lorettalynch; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 04/12/2016 9:34:21 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

She saw what happened to Loretta Fuddy...


2 posted on 04/12/2016 9:35:31 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Really!? Poor thing, he never had any control over hiring a black feminist?


3 posted on 04/12/2016 9:35:32 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Yes, yes, just like the IRS would never knowingly and intentionally target conservative groups for audits and deny them non profit status....


4 posted on 04/12/2016 9:36:34 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

why are his remarks on television not considered communication?


5 posted on 04/12/2016 9:36:49 AM PDT by Archytekt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

that’s because she’s a stooge for Obama and he doesn’t have to tell her what to do.


6 posted on 04/12/2016 9:38:06 AM PDT by Durbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Well ain’t that the troof. No doubt ‘lala’ got the implied message loud and clear. We all know how that works.


7 posted on 04/12/2016 9:38:10 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
Nasty lying half white man open forked tongue hole sound maker again.
8 posted on 04/12/2016 9:38:51 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Archytekt

Exactly. 0bama does not have to pick up the phone and tell Loretta Lynch what to do. She watches 0bama on TV and she knows exactly what he wants to be done.


9 posted on 04/12/2016 9:39:10 AM PDT by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
Instead, he will tell her what not to do.
10 posted on 04/12/2016 9:39:29 AM PDT by ken in texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

...not one smidgen of corruption.


11 posted on 04/12/2016 9:40:22 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: forgotten man

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3419583/posts


12 posted on 04/12/2016 9:40:38 AM PDT by AJFavish (www.allanfavish.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

I have a strong feeling Obama doesn’t tell anyone what to do; Valerie Jarrett does.


13 posted on 04/12/2016 9:43:15 AM PDT by Vic S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

I was thinking about how the President forcefully determined that Hillary Clinton DID NOT JEOPARDIZE NATIONAL SECURITY by moving “Classified” material to a non-secure system. And that he was Positive She COMMITTED NO CRIMES in the Handling of classified information.

With that then the Judge in this Case:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3415312/posts
Federal Judge Grants ‘Discovery’ in Clinton Email Case Judge cites ‘evidence of government

Should immediately ORDER the State Department to Furnish ALL EMAILS, Un-Redacted for the PUBLIC RECORD. If they refuse JAIL them for Contempt.

THE PRESIDENT ALREADY SAID THERE IS NOTHING THERE!!!


14 posted on 04/12/2016 9:43:36 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

“The FBI is acting stupidly.”


15 posted on 04/12/2016 9:49:11 AM PDT by paterfamilias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Durbin

Exactly.


16 posted on 04/12/2016 9:49:27 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Diversity is Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama sharing the same jail cell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

Is this Obama fellow important because he’s quite often on TV sharing his opinions on various subjects. He also seems to be slowly turning purple.


17 posted on 04/12/2016 9:50:29 AM PDT by Peter ODonnell (This is where the road divides in the woods, Bernie (start walkin buddy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Archytekt

They should be.


18 posted on 04/12/2016 10:02:41 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

” but I am confident that Hiilary did nothing wrong and will be exonerated.”


19 posted on 04/12/2016 10:05:01 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
"That's Valerie's decision, anyway."


20 posted on 04/12/2016 10:08:34 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson