To: bananaman22
Two fires at two refineries?
What a coinky-dink.
Has terrorism been unequivocally ruled out yet?
2 posted on
04/08/2016 3:45:26 PM PDT by
null and void
("when authority began inspiring contempt, it had stopped being authority" ~ H. Beam Piper)
To: bananaman22
Just in time to justify raising fuel prices for the summer.
3 posted on
04/08/2016 3:46:56 PM PDT by
MeganC
(The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
To: bananaman22
Whenever I see a story like this, my first though is, Texas City 1947.
6 posted on
04/08/2016 3:53:23 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: bananaman22
how convenient
13 posted on
04/08/2016 3:59:29 PM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
To: bananaman22
17 posted on
04/08/2016 4:01:46 PM PDT by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: bananaman22
lose the pool.
I thought for sure the first refinery fires of the spring\summer would be at the Port Arthur refinery now owned by the Saudis.
To: bananaman22
Two fires. No, nothing to see. Move along. Definitely not intentional. Most definitely not terrorist.
37 posted on
04/08/2016 5:03:22 PM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: bananaman22
45 posted on
04/08/2016 6:08:34 PM PDT by
Hoodat
(Article 4, Section 4)
To: bananaman22
One way to raise gas prices as the oil glut drives down prices.
46 posted on
04/08/2016 6:24:45 PM PDT by
PAR35
To: bananaman22
Don’t the Saudis now own Exxon?
54 posted on
04/08/2016 7:17:20 PM PDT by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson