Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Delay: FBI Has Threatened Loretta Lynch To Indict Hillary Clinton, or Else
Truth and Action ^ | April 6, 2016

Posted on 04/06/2016 11:41:43 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Hillary Clinton likely never expected to have to fight so hard just to win this year’s primary. What was supposed to be a coronation of the presumptive nominee has now become a bitter battle just to hold on to the nomination that she once had in the bag.

If that weren’t enough for Clinton, it now looks as if she may need to win one more battle if she’d like to get the nomination. Word from Washington D.C. has it that the FBI is now ready to indict the former Secretary of State for her unlawful possession of classified materials.

In fact, according to former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom Delay, the FBI has accumulated so much evidence against the Democrat frontrunner, those within the organization are threatening to go public should an indictment not occur.

See what Tom Delay has to say about the indictment on the next page:

This clearly isn’t the primary Hillary likely imagined, but the outcome may be all too familiar. No stranger to devastating primary losses, Hillary Clinton may just as likely end up a resident of the big house as she is the White House.

Former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom Delay says that insiders within the FBI are closing in on their case against Hillary Clinton, just in time for the primaries.

“They’re ready to recommend an indictment and they also say that if the attorney general does not indict, they’re going public.”

Clinton is under FBI investigation for her use of a private server to conduct confidential government business while she was secretary of state. But some Republicans fear any FBI recommendation that hurts Clinton will be squashed by the Obama administration.

DeLay, a Texas Republican and Washington Times radio host, said:

“One way or another either she’s going to be indicted and that process begins, or we try her in the public eye with her campaign. One way or another she’s going to have to face these charges.”

While many have bemoaned the lengthy process that has led to her now-impending indictment, the timing could not have been any more perfect for Hillary detractors. Should this indictment interrupt the primary season, the Democrats may very well end up with a geriatric socialist loon as their nominee. In other words, the GOP can start redecorating the White House right away.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hillary will not get indicted regardless of the evidence. However the FBI report will get leaked. Though the media will ignore the report, Hillary’s already low trust numbers will plummet.


81 posted on 04/07/2016 4:37:18 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

YES. Right on. As she said, nothing will happen. Nothing.


82 posted on 04/07/2016 4:50:29 AM PDT by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

won’t be indicted.

they will say that law enforcement should not interfere with the election process


83 posted on 04/07/2016 4:53:29 AM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’ll call BS on this one. The higher ups in the FBI won’t want to lose their jobs and pensions. I doubt there are enough in the upper positions that have the guts to go against the fed at this level.

We could use a rogue underling to spill all the beans. Maybe an FBI Snowden?


84 posted on 04/07/2016 4:58:00 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (The root word of vigilante is vigilant!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar; 2ndDivisionVet

Trump even loses to Sanders in the polls.


85 posted on 04/07/2016 5:00:39 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

What if Hillary is not the only person indicted? Besides her aides and other personnel, Bill, Sid, Chelsea, Etc... could very well be indicted in the Pay for Play scandal with the Clinton Foundation/Slush Fund. Obama may get some push back but will clear out the Clinton’s forever. He is not going to be the loser in this pissing contest.


86 posted on 04/07/2016 5:02:39 AM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
In a sane world, someone who handles the most sensitive information in such a careless and cavalier manner would be hounded out of the race as unqualified for the office. That's in a sane world, the kind we had 25 years ago, give or take. Now she could stab a kid on a street corner in public and 40% of the public would demand Trump apologize for criticizing her.

Politicians rarely get indicted, those that do rarely go to trial. Deals are cut, typically their punishment isn't prison, it's banishment from the halls of power. They resign, all is forgiven. How it goes. Hillary won't be indicted for squat, she's one of the elites. Equal justice is dead in this country.

87 posted on 04/07/2016 5:07:17 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is an all-in play for Clinton. If she loses the election her potential for power, money, and influence are drastically reduced. Even more so if she loses in the primary. She has to win, has to.

If she has to face criminal prosecution she cannot lose that, because that translates to losing the election. Worse, the Clinton foundation or whatever's left of it takes a big hit. She might not only not gain money, power, and influence - she could (horror of horrors) lose ground there.

We are entering a very dangerous time. She is like a cornered wounded animal. She will lash out. The 'rat primaries are going to get uglier and uglier. (though with Sanders and Clinton in there its hard to imagine more ugly) If/when she's facing charges...I would not want to be one of the people potentially testifying against her, or any member of their family. There will be threats, and there may be some follow-through on those threats to shut up witnesses etc.

She is all-in, and there is nothing, absolutely nothing I would put past her and billy-boy.

88 posted on 04/07/2016 5:27:36 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
I guess there is no way the Obama admin will indict her.

I agree... zero chance. Democrats always cover for each other.

And the GOPe always puts all their eggs in one basket, expecting their opponent to be caught, indicted, etc. instead of fighting the good fight - it's the lazy way out. Then they get caught flat footed.

They should not depend on Clinton getting even a slap on the wrist. The apparatchiks in government, including the FBI, will not let that happen.

89 posted on 04/07/2016 5:28:49 AM PDT by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“FBI Has Threatened Loretta Lynch To Indict Hillary Clinton, or Else”
Sorry, but you’re going to have to rewrite the headline in coherent English.


90 posted on 04/07/2016 5:44:34 AM PDT by I want the USA back (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

USG == lawless. Yes, there are a few good men therein.


91 posted on 04/07/2016 5:45:26 AM PDT by veracious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It will be the else then. Because sure is not going to be indicted. If the FBI is so eager to have her indicted, why don’t they arrest her?


92 posted on 04/07/2016 5:52:03 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Since it is Hillary (and possibly Bill), the case has to be iron clad. Obviously, someone in the FBI is leaking information. Probably to put the DOJ on notice that they are not going to stand for a cover up. As a rule the FBI makes no comment on ongoing investigations. The leaks are sending a message.


93 posted on 04/07/2016 5:52:22 AM PDT by Roses0508
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Delay knows this how?


94 posted on 04/07/2016 5:53:29 AM PDT by gogeo (Donald Trump. Because it's finally come to that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

I’ve been around here longer than you.


95 posted on 04/07/2016 5:59:25 AM PDT by IncPen (Hey Media: Bias = Layoffs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Word from Washington D.C. has it that the FBI is now ready to indict the former Secretary of State for her unlawful possession of classified materials.

Complete b.s. If they are ready, why don't they just do it? Disinformation.

96 posted on 04/07/2016 6:19:32 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Ted Cruz was the man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
or we try her in the public eye with her campaign.

The public is not smart enough to understand or care.

97 posted on 04/07/2016 6:21:25 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Ted Cruz was the man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m in the group that thinks 0 will never indict Clinton.

But, if the FBI recommends an indictment and 0 refuses, it’s no slam dunk that Hillary gets elected. Her hard core supporters and the media (not that there is a difference), will still support her, but independents will bail. The way 0’s magic touch has worked on just about every other candidate he has supported, the end result may be a republican in office and 0’s lasting legacy being his willingness to ignore the rule of law (again) in a failed attempt to gain crass political advantage.

The pressure has to be on the FBI director to not recommend an indictment. There would still be fall out from angry agents but 0 is off the hook and Clinton’s “it’s was no big deal” claim gains traction.


98 posted on 04/07/2016 6:21:29 AM PDT by fungoking (40% share for a TV show is a hit; in the 2016 election it a loss in a landslide, hello Pres Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

The only one I’m paying any attention to is Joe DeGenova. He’s very familiar with the workings of these proceedings and I read the other day that the hiring of Gregory’s wife by a band of Clinton cohorts is not a good thing. It enables them to get their stories in sync and makes it difficult for a perjury charge.


99 posted on 04/07/2016 6:27:02 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
Disinformation

It's political theatre. Entertainment for the peons. Nothing will happen to her.

100 posted on 04/07/2016 6:27:09 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson