Cruz Sex Scandal: Trump Accused Of Planting Story As Serious Doubts Arise About Alleged Affairs

The Inquisitr News ^ | March 30, 2016 | Nathan Francis

[2ndDivisionVet]

The Ted Cruz sex scandal story just took another twist, with Cruz blaming Donald Trump for allegedly planting the story that ran last week and serious doubts arising over whether any of it is actually true.

The National Enquirer story accused Cruz of cheating on his wife, Heidi, with as many as five mistresses. The women were not named in the story but were quickly identified through their blurred out pictures and details of the alleged affairs.

Cruz immediately denounced the story as untrue — as have some of the women identified as his mistresses — and now Cruz is going on the offensive against Donald Trump. Cruz has accused Trump of planting the story, noting that the only named source in the story is a former aide to Donald Trump

CNN recounted Cruz’s accusations.

“Cruz suggested that Roger Stone, a former aide to Trump, and David Pecker, CEO of the National Enquirer’s parent company, had been in cahoots, pushing an item he has repeatedly denied and denounced as ‘garbage.'”

“‘The story, on its face, quoted one person on the record: Roger Stone,’ Cruz said during a CNN town hall event in Wisconsin. ‘Roger Stone has been Donald Trump’s chief political adviser. He planned and ran his presidential campaign and he’s been his hatchet man — he’s spent 40 years as a hatchet man. But not only that, the head of the National Enquirer, a guy named David Pecker, is good friends with Donald Trump.'”

There are serious doubts being raised about the Ted Cruz sex scandal story, with several media outlets poking holes in the Enquirer’s story...

[Bob434]

Why the hell should he? Do you htink he hasn’t told his wife? Anti-Cruz people will never accept anything he says- they’ve flat out declared him a liar- Here- Here’s a refresher - they can’t speak about him without childishly saying crap like “Lying Ted” “Slimy Ted”- And now they want him to jump through hoops to ‘make it all go away with just one simple little phrase’? Yeah ok- We all were born yesterday- we believe that- yep- wink wink nod nod!

It’s tabloid scumbag smear- if he has nothing to apologize for then he has nothing to ‘admit’ to any despicable anti-cruz hack-

[PJ-Comix]

Stone was interviewed on WIOD radio in Miami this morning and I doubt he planted the Enquirer story. It they put up the audio, I will link to it so you can judge for yourself.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Agreed, Cruz is scum and the more he talks the more his slime is revealed. Would run over Trump, who the he** talks like that? He’s a child.

[spel_grammer_an_punct_polise]

“Rubio already moved to retain all of his delegates. That’s his bargaining chip for VP.”

I think that it is already a done deal.....done in the smoky back room of which all of us have heard.

[Forty-Niner]

You seem to conveniently forget all those sCruz outright mischaracterizations of Trump positions to “prove” that Trump holds positions diametrically opposed to the ones he actually holds. When you do that people are going to call you a liar. People are going to say you’re running a slimy campaign.

Methinks you protest too much! The shoe fits where it fits.

[BagCamAddict]

You mean you think Rubio and Trump have already talked?

[Bob434]

[[You seem to conveniently forget all those sCruz outright mischaracterizations of Trump positions to “prove” that Trump holds positions diametrically opposed to the ones he actually holds.]]

I’m sorry, what were those positions again? The ones where he was calling on his liberal ideology he held just a year or so BEFORE running for office and changing his positions for political expediency? Donald has demonstrably flip flopped on several issues- Ted calls him to the carpet for it and trump supporters run to trump’s defense by crying foul and labeling Ted ‘slimy’ ‘lying ted’? Really,? That’s your defense? Trump had bragged about his liberal ideals, and his positions on many issues were well known- He even defended his liberal views by trying to falsely compare himself to Ronald claiming Ronald ‘was a democrat too’ before switching parties (conveniently leaving out the FACT that Ronald was a very moderate liberal- not a far left liberal like Danald was-

[[Methinks you protest too much!]]

Yeah, like you’re not protesting too much about Trump being ‘unfairly mischaracterized’ by Cruz- Careful there fella-

[spel_grammer_an_punct_polise]

“You mean you think Rubio and Trump have already talked?”

Yes, of course, I think that they have already talked. Why else would Rubio try to ‘get’ Cruz after Rubio has already dropped out of the race? It makes no sense otherwise.

[Bob434]

[[Why else would Rubio try to ‘get’ Cruz after Rubio has already dropped out of the race? It makes no sense otherwise.]]

Not saying he is, but there is a reason why he would- to destroy ted’s popularity enough that rubio could sneak into the presidency in a brokered convention

[Bob434]

silence today from those assuring us that ‘thursday it’s over for Ted- National enquirer has blistering new ‘evidence’ that will sink Ted cruz”

Here’s the ‘blistering new evidence’ anti-cruz hacks are casting all their hopes of destroying 5 women and a man and his family over

A ‘snitch’ reports that he/she ‘heard ted had sex in a closet’ (The woman denies it)

an ‘insider’ (unnamed of course) says ‘it is alleged’ that Ted had affair with one of his staff

Another ‘Snitch’ says that someone ‘caught Ted and another woman ‘getting cozy together’ on the campaign trail

Another ‘insider’ Says a ‘4’th woman= MAY HAVE - had an affair

another ‘source’ claims Ted has had sex with a prositute-

and the final ‘devastating evidence’ ‘reported’ by the National Enquirer? A blogger- Yes, a blogger has said essentially that Ted is ‘utterly destroyed’ as a CHristian man

And the NE ‘reported that Ted had a drinking problem sometime in the past- (As though this somehow solidifies the slimy cheating rumors)

Well there you have it folks- the ‘devastating evidence’ that every anti-cruz hack assured us was ‘going to destroy Ted’- first they assured us it was coming out last monday- then they said “Just wait- it’s coming out on Thursday- Ted is finished” And they even went so far as to assure everyone that there was ‘video, photographic, audio and DNA evidence that the NE was going to release-

Funny how main stream media has turned away from the story, and how even though the story was shopped around to blogger for months, none of them took it seriously because nothing could be substantiated-

[saleman]

Dave Pecker head of the National Enquirer.

Boy. I bet he had a hard time growing up.

[nopardons]

You're very gullible and easily impressed.

Did you read my earlier post about XIGUO JIFA ?

HELL, that was even ( though translated into English ) used in the Brit updated series of the "modern Sherlock Holmes"!

Memorization and learning by rote, goes back to pre-written history, for crying out loud.

I know lots of people who, depending on whether they are auditory or reading learners have what you consider to be some "special" ability....without using menomics and/or "the palaces of the mind" bit. I'm not being "petty" at all, just saying that he only performed this act once and no, it's all that unusual. The Catholic Church had priest learn how to do this and teach it, over 1/2 a millennia ago. They even had a famous priest/missionary teach it to the Chinese.

Ted did NOT have TWO American Citizens for parents at his birth AND he was born in Canada. Neither one nor both were serving in our Military at that time, he wasn't born on a military base, nor American territory, so you're wrong, no matter whom/what you are quoting! It's all just being swept under the rug because of Obama!

[Bob434]

[[Ted did NOT have TWO American Citizens for parents at his birth AND he was born in Canada.]]

I’m guillible? Lol- Ted didn’t need two US citizens- the courts have recognized exactly what i said they did- A child born to a US CITIZEN is by virtue of birthright a US NBC citizen

[[Neither one nor both were serving in our Military at that time,]]

Wow- you really don’t understand current law and amendments about this issue do you?

[[he wasn’t born on a military base, nor American territory, so you’re wrong,]]

Lol- yeah, I’m the oen that’s wrong- you can say ‘nuh uh’ all you like- current law states that there is no differecne between two women’s children when both women are overseas and oen chooses to go home for her birth and one doesn’t- and current law states that only one parent has to be a citizen NOT both and it is not necessary for either oen to work in the military contrary to you claim- you might want to look into htis issue before digging the hole you’re in any deeper-

[[I know lots of people who, depending on whether they are auditory or reading learners have what you consider to be some “special” ability....without using menomics and/or “the palaces of the mind” bit.]]

Wow- you know ‘lots of people’ who can recall, word for word, and punctuation for punctuation, what they heard years ago huh? You must have very special Friends then

[[I’m not being “petty” at all, just saying that he only performed this act once and no, it’s all that unusual.]]

Psssst- he does it all the time- even getting the pauses and inflection right- Many peopel have remarked how incredible it is, but by golly nopardons says it aint all that incredible because he ‘knows many people capable of such feats’

[[I’m not being “petty” at all]]

Yeah, ok- whatever-

[Bob434]

less than 20% of the population has some form of Eidetic memory (this includes all forms of recall- visual audio and others) even less have some form of elevated audio recall- most people have some form of elevated visual recall- Elevated Audio recall isn’t very common at all- not the higher levels we’re talking about- Most everyone is capable of recalling some of what htey hear- but very very few peopel can remember word for word, and even be accurate enough to remember pauses, and punctuations things they heard in the past-

Some people have remarkable memories, and can remember quite a bit,, and one can teach oneself to learn and remember more efficiently, however, not many peopel can casually hear tights and remember either word for word, or nearly word for word, things they heard years earlier only once-

[[Rote learning is the memorization of information based on repetition.]]

It is claimed by those hwo know Ted and have seen him in action, He does NOT set his mind to learning things by repetition and that he only needs to hear it once-

[nopardons]

Argue with our government then, because the NBC law has NOT been changed. I knew about this in '05, long before either Obama or Ted, or Nikki Hally, Bibby Jindal, Marco Rubio ( ALL NON-NBCers ) were in the national news.

Oh for crying out loud; ask anyone of a certain age and you'll you'll find lots of people who can still repeat long ago memorized poetry, songs, lines in a play, what they read decades ago,or heard decades ago.

I realize that you are so emotionally tied to Cruz, that you aren't going to accept any fact which is against your preconceived ideas and/or biases, but hopefully, some day the scales will fall from your eyes and you will ne able to accept reality.

I know that nothing I post, to prove my point, will be believed either, because you'll claim that I cheated somehow. It's really too bad, because I could easily prove the point by reciting things that I either read, or was read to me, more decades ago than I care to admit to on this thread. It's no big deal; really it isn't.

And really, many people, even here on FR, use lines from old T.V. shows, as part of or an entire post , WITHOUT looking it up! I guess that YOU are surrounded by people with VERY SPECIAL "GIFTS", but never realized it. LOL

[nopardons]

YAAAAAAAAAAAAWN!

You ignore everything I post, have yet to refute what I posted, and just dig your heels in deeper. Fine...I'll just continue laughing at you.

Oh and FYI....you can't "remember punctuation" when you are remembering something that was said; as you claimed. *snicker*

[Bob434]

[[YAAAAAAAAAAAAWN!]]

lol- like i said in another thread- enjoy your grade school rhetoric

[[Oh and FYI....you can’t “remember punctuation”]]

One can remember where sentences are emphasised with exclamation point,s pauses, even dramatic pauses- which correlate to punctuation-

[Bob434]

[Argue with our government then, because the NBC law has NOT been changed.]]

I don’t have to argue with them- they agree as does the supreme court- The law is clear- just as i explained- there is no difference between a child born overseas to us citizen and one born here- You can look this stuff up yourself-

[[It’s really too bad, because I could easily prove the point by reciting things that I either read, or was read to me, more decades ago than I care to admit to on this thread.]]

Lol- word for word eh? That’s remarkable- you are i n the minority then- I didn’t state the % by just pulling those out of thin air- you can look it up yourself-

[[because I could easily prove the point by reciting things that I either read, or was read to me, more decades ago than I care to admit to on this thread. It’s no big deal; really it isn’t.]]

Keep digging! Very few people can remember word for word and emphasis for emphasis- you must be one of those very few- good for you- I’ll have to simply take your word for it-

[[And really, many people, even here on FR, use lines from old T.V.]]

A line is much different than remembering the way he does- Have them remember and repeat whole scenes getting the meaning and tone and punctuation points correct- word for word- Not many people will be able to after having only seen something once-

[[Oh for crying out loud; ask anyone of a certain age and you’ll you’ll find lots of people who can still repeat long ago memorized poetry, ]]

LOL- now go ask them if they ‘memorized it’ after hearing it just once- how many do you think there will be? keep spinning- it’s amusing- how deep ya gonna dig?