Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Cruz Pay Hush Money to Fiorina?
Youtube ^ | 3/25/2016

Posted on 03/26/2016 8:08:23 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

In what is rapidly turning into the biggest sex scandal since Bill & Hillary Clinton, the Federal Election Commission is now said to be looking into what may be a potential hush money payoff from Cruz to – get this Carly Fiorina.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: adulterated; alexjones; bfac; billstill; buymybook; california; caracarletonfiorina; caracarletonsneed; carlyfiorina; carlyforamerica; conspiracy; cruz; cruzhaters; democratunderground; disinformation; disruptor; du; fiorina; hearsay; icarly; keepthepromise; loonytoons; moretrumplies; mretrumlies; noproof; paidtrumpvolunteer; sarahisgurflores; slander; superpac; tedcruz; texas; tinfoilhat; trumpcookedup; trumppaidposter; trumpssupporterlies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
Mind-boggling to me how ANYONE can watch Cruz for 2 minutes & NOT see what a complete PHONY he is

Only takes 10 seconds with Trump.

61 posted on 03/26/2016 9:14:35 PM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

*** I’d like to know why Cruz donated $500,000 to Florina. ***

I think it was to keep things quiet about Sarah Isgur Flores, who was Carly’s Campaign Manager, or maybe it went to Sarah via the PAC. I couldn’t find an expenditures summary for Carly for America.


62 posted on 03/26/2016 9:15:37 PM PDT by sockmonkey (Donald Trump will ban auto-correct with an Executive Order. Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

You have proof that Cruz and the Super PAC committed a crime?


63 posted on 03/26/2016 9:16:31 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer

Who blackmailed who and where is the evidence? Or are you just into a bit of libel now and then?


64 posted on 03/26/2016 9:18:54 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: berdie

It’s called “hedging your bets”. Nobody ever heard of this before?


65 posted on 03/26/2016 9:21:37 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

[[When you run as a “pure” Christian]]

I’m sorry, can you please point out where Ted ever claimed he was a ‘pure Christian’?

[[Cruz is NOT a “pure” anything.]]

Stop the presses! Egads! Gasp! He isn’t? Shocking!

[[The ONLY Pure Person is JESUS CHRIST!]]

Finally, a bit of truth!

[[If Cruz doesn’t come out and say, “I have not had any extra-marital affairs”, he’s lying.]]

On what planet? I’m pretty sure there is no law saying one must say anything regarding scandal rag accusations in order to be declared innocent- What if he doesn’t use a hyphen between ‘extra’ and ‘marital’ is he still a liar? Not sure what the exact ‘rules of truthfulness’ are- perhaps you could enlighten us o nthe specific rules?


66 posted on 03/26/2016 9:24:28 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

“...is now said to be looking into...”

Translation: “I just made this up.”

If you can’t say who’s saying it, no-one is saying it but you.


67 posted on 03/26/2016 9:42:06 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
Since I am a horse racing aficionado...I certainly understand “hedging your bets”.

But my question had to do with one super pac transferring funds to another super pac and how that money could be used as hush money.

I'm sure there is a way... but how?

68 posted on 03/26/2016 9:48:53 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Cruz is a coward. He is trying to pin the Canadian Mistress Crisis on Trump. Cruz had no harsh words for the NE, did he? Is he going to sue for libel? Did Cruz demand a retraction? No.

Still Report # 736 - Enquirer: 3 More Cruz Babes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dB3VXwD6X0

L’affaire of Ted Cruz: A lover’s sister-in-law speaks out.
https://medium.com/@Blackppl4Trump/l-affaire-of-ted-cruz-c1818b9db18f#.ev8toxt68


69 posted on 03/26/2016 10:03:33 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (I am so very blessed! Thank You, JESUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

[[Cruz had no harsh words for the NE, did he? Is he going to sue for libel? Did Cruz demand a retraction? No.]]

Well there ya go folks- proof positive cruz must be a slimy liar and adulterer- I’m pretty sure that is the first thing a judge asks a defendant “Did you sue? No? GUILTY!”

i know you hate him- it’s very very evident- however, let’s try to use some common sense- not suing someone is NOT an automatic admission of guilt- that is a rediculous lien to be taking, and a real stretch of credibility- and I’ve seen numerous people making silly leap-


70 posted on 03/26/2016 10:07:43 PM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

In your own words, these are “allegations” with no proof attached. Does a G-2 or J-2 depend on “allegations.”

You have assumed a “guilty until proved innocent” tact here.

Please remember, there is no proof. Cruz has not “put his family in a tragic situation,” because there are nothing but unsourced rumors. There is nothing but an article in a tabloid rag published by a friend of The Donald.

How would you feel if someone said you were not a BlackFemaleArmyCaptain, but really are white, socialist troll, trying to dishearten and split conservatives. I’m not saying you are, but there is as much proof of that as there is currnetly of the Cruz affair rumor.

If you think this is an “informative article,” I hope you would allow more sound judgements than this to affect commands given to troops in combat.

One more thing: I am a Trump supporter. Have you ever stopped to think that come November, we will need ALL the Cruz voters, all the Rubio voters, and all the Kasich voters if we are to beat Hillary, and that’s all that counts, not these preliminary maneuvers.

Think about it.


71 posted on 03/26/2016 10:08:02 PM PDT by Strac6 (Hillary's Goin' Down! ... and this time, it won't be on Huma.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

BFAC ... you have been exposed as a PAID TRUMP “volunteer”.

Take a hike.


72 posted on 03/26/2016 10:11:56 PM PDT by proudpapa (Cruz or Lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
"In what is said.........is said to be looking into....."

Hang it up!

Total BS - Barbra Streisand!

73 posted on 03/26/2016 10:24:54 PM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain
Let's examine the facts, shall we?

The transfer of $500,000 from a Cruz super-PAC to a Fiorina super-PAC is a FACT.

It's also a fact, if I'm not mistaken, that one of the women Ted Cruz allegedly had an affair with worked for the Fiorina campaign at the time.

It's also apparently a fact, again if I'm not mistaken, that that $500,000 transaction raised eyebrows at the FEC.

I'd like to hear the explanation for this transaction. It does seem unusual to have such a transfer between the super-PACs of two opposing campaigns.

For now, there aren't a lot of other facts.

I'm quite sure that there will be more information forthcoming. Everyone should just keep their powder dry and stop engaging in wild speculation, including the lobbing of unfounded accusations and counter-accusations.

There's no need for Cruz supporters to get hysterical yet. The truth will come out.

I'm a Trump supporter, and I'm withholding judgement on this Cruz story. I am highly skeptical that Donald Trump had anything to do with the release of this story, especially since the Rubio campaign was clearly Tweeting about it a couple of weeks ago, and now people are going back and trying to scour those tweets.

But the primary mystery is whether any of these allegations are true. There does seem to be some circumstantial evidence accumulating, but as yet there's not enough to draw any concrete conclusions.

As more information emerges, it's going to be either incriminating or exculpatory for Ted Cruz, so let's just wait and see.

I know everyone wants instant gratification and for all the facts to explode onto the scene immediately, but that's not how these things work.

In any event, there's ample time for this story to "shake out" before the Wisconsin primary...

74 posted on 03/26/2016 10:33:09 PM PDT by sargon (Go, Trump, Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strac6
How would you feel if someone said you were not a BlackFemaleArmyCaptain, but really are white, socialist troll, trying to dishearten and split conservatives.

If you click on BFAC's "about" page, there is nothing on it. No mention of military service, units served with....nothing. Somewhat odd that someone who chooses to identify themselves with a military identifier wouldn't put anything at all about their service on their about page.

Although, in fairness, I haven't seen BFAC actually claim to be a black female army captain at all. After all, it is just a screen name. For example, it may surpise some to learn that I am not actually the chin of the incomparable Bruce Campbell.

I know many fellow vets, and I don't know any who would choose to identify themselves simply by rote recitation of race, gender, branch, and rank. More ofter you get some slang, or MOS identifier, etc.. It's almost like someone just invented that combination so as to check off every possible box to gain credibility so their opinions could not be attacked.

75 posted on 03/26/2016 10:58:08 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Strac6
One more thing: I am a Trump supporter. Have you ever stopped to think that come November, we will need ALL the Cruz voters, all the Rubio voters, and all the Kasich voters if we are to beat Hillary, and that’s all that counts, not these preliminary maneuvers.

It is really unfortunate that more of your fellow Trump supporters don't share your rationality and foresight. Because I think there is too much water over the damn for rallying around Trump to occur. The bitterness is very real. And while that may not seem very smart, people cast votes that are not in their rationale interests for emotional reasons, including simple spite/revenge.

If Trump is going to win the general election, he's probably going to have to do it with a record low percentage of support by registered Republicans.

76 posted on 03/26/2016 11:04:38 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: apocalypto

Maybe it went to one of Carly’s employees who is alleged to have had an affair with Cruz...her name is Sarah Isgur.


77 posted on 03/26/2016 11:35:52 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Cruz voters: Wake up! Trump is our only chance of stopping the gopE. If not now, never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
Regarding BFAC’s screen name, some folks here pick their screen name to honor someone else, like a close relative for example.

Just throwing that out for consideration.

78 posted on 03/26/2016 11:45:36 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

You know...some 16 years ago when I joined FR, I got into a bit of a flame tiff with another poster and went after their screen name. I learned that screen names and people are not the same thing...we pick screen names for lots of obscure reasons. Unfortunately my screen name is my actual name...I was born a poor big kahuna into a family of 17 big kahunas. We used to have to wake up at 3:17 in the morning and sweep the lake before school where we walked uphill in the blinding snow...but we were thankful.


79 posted on 03/27/2016 12:09:21 AM PDT by abigkahuna (How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain; JudyinCanada; rovenstinez; stratboy; af_vet_1981; E. Pluribus Unum; ...
Still Report # 736 - Enquirer: 3 More Cruz Babes

I'm sure you meant well, but it looks like you have posted this story many times, but the author (Bill Still) now says that story WAS A FAKE and he FELL FOR IT...
Here:
          "Still Report # 737 - Mistakes Made on the Cruz Sex Scandal Story"
          "I fell for this apparently faked photoshopped image of a National Enquirer page. -Bill Still, Mar 26, 2016"

My guess is the 5-mistresses story was known by the Cruz camp to be looming for weeks, and they were ready with the "faked similar stories" to deflect the real story.
That was a counter-tactic Hillary used to do as well, on Bubba's behalf.

The Cruz staffers may have even known WHEN "theThing" was coming, hence that could be why Jeff Roe (Cruz's "bare-knuckle" campaign manager) bought and used the GQ photo of Melania Trump when he did it.

Cruz would like nothing better than FR and others on the internet to run with the FAKED "3 More Cruz Babes" story, in order to say... "see, the internet is full of KOOKS"

80 posted on 03/27/2016 12:15:07 AM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson