Posted on 03/21/2016 8:55:40 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Case in point.
Just remember, these are the courts that said if you grow a crop and consume it all in one state, it is still interstate commerce. These are the courts that said as long as the baby’s head is inside the mother it is not murder to kill the baby. These are the courts who said that to say a prayer in a public school was establishing religion. These are the courts who said that marriage must not be defined as between one man and one woman. So if you liked those decisions, you probably like this one.
This was already Posted last week and beat into the ground.
Already posted by conservative joy....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3411529/posts
Very easily found on Search.
BS! Bet the “judge” is voting for Cruz or Hillery.
Is Judge Pellegrini one of those judges who does what the guys tell him too?
The plan would be to toss Cruz out after he was nominated. It would be pointless for Hillary, Soros, and the bros. to do it any earlier.
I search EVERY title before posting a thread.
That's silly. Anyone can find various court decisions they both agree with and disagree with.
About the only thing I'll ever give McCain credit for is that he got something passed in DC that defined him as eligible before before he ran, and that because he was born on US-controlled soil. Even Obama acknowledged that he had to produce a paper that said he was born in the USA.
He was born in Panama, not the Canal Zone.
The court correctly decided that an individual has the right to keep and bear arms in the Heller case. I like that one, how bout you?
What I’m saying is what’s the accepted wisdom in those two situations, McCain and Obama. I’m not saying I’m sure the accepted wisdom is true. With Cruz, it’s still an open question, and it will only take one judge to muck things ump.
I don’t know why Cruz waited until now to renounce his Canadian citizenship. What purpose did keeping it serve?
Ummm...except it was the Dems who challenged eligibility in Pa.
http://harvardlawreview.org/2015/03/on-the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/
As was the case in British law at the time of the writing of the Constitution, there is no doubt that Cruz is a natural born citizen of the US.
Let me help some of you folks. The “Commonwealth court of Pennsylvania” means absolutely nothing . The reason Trump laid off “Foreign Bord “ didqualification under Article II is because Cruz is out of this nomination fight. He is irrelevant. He doesn’t have the will of the people.
Federal issues are not ruled on by state lower court partisan judges. Never. In a dream , if Cruz won. hillary will have him enjoined because he is foreign born in a week!! IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF HER CHOOSING.But we don’t have to worry about that. Cruz is not our nominee. Trump will be our nominee or the voting will of the people will be raped.
Guess what....I put in the first three words of you title....and the other thread popped right up.
Are you searching in Engrish?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.