Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Two questions remain to be answered more clearly before some will be very keen to vote for Trump (although with the likely opponent, people will do it regardless of any hesitation).

First question, is he really that skeptical of climate change to avoid any further erosion of the economic integrity of America in favor of the crazy green agenda?

Second question, what about religious liberty, in particular, the challenge to Christian beliefs posed by the radical gay lobby?

With Ted Cruz, you know the answers to these two questions and so at the very least I hope he gets either the V.P. or Supreme Court position if Trump is the candidate.

I am also not convinced that a wall is going to work on a practical basis with half the border being a river. Perhaps walls in some sectors and enhanced patrols and security in other sectors. Probably a wall from the Pacific to about central Arizona then security patrols, another wall near Ciudad Juarez and much improved security in Texas.

The bigger problem in this policy is finding the millions of illegals and deporting them. This will partly reduce the flow of new illegals, who’s going to want to risk paying smugglers if they figure on being deported within three months anyway?

I suspect Trump is going to win the nomination so much of this discussion about Trump vs Cruz is now almost academic. The bigger question is how to get Trump past the inevitable problems of massive voter fraud and media manipulation and into office.


18 posted on 03/11/2016 12:05:53 PM PST by Peter ODonnell (Bernie Sanders -- are you kidding me? the guy's a COMMUNIST -- c'mon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Peter ODonnell
First question, is he really that skeptical of climate change to avoid any further erosion of the economic integrity of America in favor of the crazy green agenda?

I think Trump would be more inclined than most to look closely at the cost side of the green agenda. A whole lot of federal policy should be subjected to an intensive cost-benefit analysis.

28 posted on 03/11/2016 12:43:55 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Peter ODonnell

The bigger problem in this policy is finding the millions of illegals and deporting them. This will partly reduce the flow of new illegals, who’s going to want to risk paying smugglers if they figure on being deported within three months anyway?

/===/

A question asked previously, but not in this thread. As I recall the answer was that removing the benefits would render them without
Medical
Dental
Housing
Schooling
Family Aid
And a host of other benefits that draw them to this country illegally.
Once that stops, they won’t be able to survive here and will voluntarily leave.
Also, I have always wondered why ICE was not there in force and with paddy wagons when illegal aliens had a protest?? WTF, they show up in droves. Round em all up, collect their families and BOOM mass deportation. But that is just My Opinion.


48 posted on 03/11/2016 3:34:25 PM PST by Rustybucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson