Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

It’s meaningless posturing designed to score points with the conservative base, when there’s no likelihood of it overcoming a veto.

Pass it again next year under a Republican president, and it will have meaning.


6 posted on 03/07/2016 2:39:40 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

“It’s meaningless posturing designed to score points with the conservative base, when there’s no likelihood of it overcoming a veto.”

Of course if they didn’t do this you would still be complaining.


12 posted on 03/07/2016 3:00:23 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
It’s meaningless posturing designed to score points with the conservative base, when there’s no likelihood of it overcoming a veto.

Pass it again next year under a Republican president, and it will have meaning.

Force the veto, force the rats to run for reelection after having voted against it. Force the presidential candidates to justify their position on it.

14 posted on 03/07/2016 3:12:47 PM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625; All

The bill is more than political posturing. Pass or fail, It identifies the legislators who voted against the bill, and their exposure will be useful in future elections.


21 posted on 03/07/2016 3:50:58 PM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common any more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson