Replies

I didn’t write “Certificate”. I wrote “Backed”. There IS a difference.

I don’t want to change your mind. You can maintain your opinion. This is America. At least for awhile.

When in a debate, sometimes some people actually try to understand what the other person is saying and judge it’s merits rather than make straw man arguments.

At this point, I don’t think it’s worth discussing with you, since you are not interested in an accurate representation of each other’s viewpoints.

Troll on, dude.

I didn’t write “Certificate”. I wrote “Backed”. There IS a difference.

United States Notes were not backed by silver.

You can maintain your opinion.

Opinion? It's a fact that EO 11110 did not mention United States Notes and rather than eliminating FRNs, resulted in printing $1 and $2 FRNs, for the first time.

At this point, I don’t think it’s worth discussing with you, since you are not interested in an accurate representation of each other’s viewpoints.

I understand your viewpoints. You originally said the Founders were against a Central Bank, but you realized you were wrong.

You originally said EO 11110 would have eliminated the Fed or weakened the Fed and would have resulted in new United States Notes.

I've given you a source that shows that was not the case. If you find one that shows your viewpoints were correct, I'm still willing to be convinced.