Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump, the Greatest Threat to the Establishment since JFK
US Defense Watch ^ | February 28, 2016 | Ray Starmann

Posted on 02/28/2016 7:19:08 PM PST by pboyington

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 last
To: Toddsterpatriot

I didn’t write “Certificate”. I wrote “Backed”. There IS a difference.

I don’t want to change your mind. You can maintain your opinion. This is America. At least for awhile.

When in a debate, sometimes some people actually try to understand what the other person is saying and judge it’s merits rather than make straw man arguments.

At this point, I don’t think it’s worth discussing with you, since you are not interested in an accurate representation of each other’s viewpoints.

Troll on, dude.


121 posted on 03/15/2016 11:13:36 AM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain
I didn’t write “Certificate”. I wrote “Backed”. There IS a difference.

United States Notes were not backed by silver.

You can maintain your opinion.

Opinion? It's a fact that EO 11110 did not mention United States Notes and rather than eliminating FRNs, resulted in printing $1 and $2 FRNs, for the first time.

At this point, I don’t think it’s worth discussing with you, since you are not interested in an accurate representation of each other’s viewpoints.

I understand your viewpoints. You originally said the Founders were against a Central Bank, but you realized you were wrong.

You originally said EO 11110 would have eliminated the Fed or weakened the Fed and would have resulted in new United States Notes.

I've given you a source that shows that was not the case. If you find one that shows your viewpoints were correct, I'm still willing to be convinced.

122 posted on 03/15/2016 11:30:22 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

dude, just because I drop discussing a point, does not mean I say or think I was wrong. It means I don’t think you have the ability to reason.

http://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2008/07/21/why-the-founders-rejected-a-central-bank/

I have better things to do than respond to a troll!

I am NOT going to respond to you after this - but that DOES NOT mean I think you are right. Enjoy your life.


123 posted on 03/15/2016 11:40:22 AM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: BereanBrain
dude, just because I drop discussing a point, does not mean I say or think I was wrong

Dude, your post #115 shows the Founders created the first US Central Bank, in 1791.

Ron Paul thinks the Founders rejected a Central Bank?

Maybe you should send him the link in your post #115?

124 posted on 03/15/2016 11:48:44 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson