But it was not to be. Clinton's involvement in the Monica Lewinsky scandal and his subsequent impeachment for perjury and obstruction of justice derailed his plans. Despite being found not guilty, his reputation was in tatters. He never recovered, and his entire final-year agenda for his presidency went by the wayside -- a victim of his own insatiable appetites.
____________________________
Which makes me wonder ... why didn't ANYONE ELSE in Congress take this up?
It was not much different from Bush’s reform, but Dems by then were in obstruction mode.
Because they want to keep their jobs.
“
Which makes me wonder ... why didn’t ANYONE ELSE in Congress take this up?”
“Affairs of State take precedence over the affairs of State....” They were all outside walking the parapet.
Singapore has similar system and it works very well. Ten percent from the worker and ten percent from the employer. Since the worker has online access the employers find it difficult time getting behind on their payments.
Congress doesn’t want Social Security converted to a private pension system because then they won’t be able to tap that big, huge pile of money for buying votes from Democrats.
If no one has any idea what’s going on in Social Security then no one will easily notice that the system is short a trillion dollars or so.
and Monica ended up with herpes. Guess she should have asked for his medical records to be unsealed.
Too many men get tempted to think with that instead of their brain.
I have a great idea, how about the gubmint leave me and my income alone, I will take care of myself. All they have to do is givee back my money, we’ll call it even.
BECAUSE THIS IS A LIE.
Blaming it on Monica is just distraction.
Congress didn’t want reform and they wouldn’t have it.
Congress wanted that SS surplus to spend.
They’d have blocked reform no matter what anyway.
Clinton was in office for 8 years. McLarty's trip to Chile was during his first term. Clinton never could move forward on Social Security reform because of the Lewinsky scandal and impeachment? I don't buy it. He simply didn't try.
The money goes in a "lockbox."
I seem to recall that G.W. Bush made a feeble attempt at the same thing. However, his political capital was waning at the time and AARP packed the first couple of hearings with their SEIU thugs to ensure nothing happened.
Not long after he finally gave up, the housing collapse occured and investment portfolios tanked.
If Bush had succeeded and most people had followed the advice of the MSM and the banksters, then most people would have lost big time.
It would have been a nail in the coffin for the Republican party regardless of whether or not it had been a good idea.
I’ve spoken to a number of my colleagues and all of us had to pay on our tax returns. Was this tied to Social Security in some fashion?
What? Not guilty? I would have sworn that WJC was found guilty and subsequently lost his license to practice law in Arkansas.
This looks like one of those wormy little "factoids" with which liberals spice an article so as to cloud history and pervert the current narrative on a "beloved" figure, such as Grandpa Billy.