Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RFEngineer

I’ve been mocking EMP alarmism for 20 years. In that NOBODY who ever actually had the job of planning to kill lots of people has EVER come out and said “yep we planned to use high altitude EMPs to disable large chunks of electronics”, and of course in that time NOBODY has attempted an EMP based attack an ANY altitude.

The facts are in, the “threat” is a lie.


66 posted on 02/04/2016 4:09:38 PM PST by discostu (This is a different kind of flying... all together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: discostu

“In that NOBODY who ever actually had the job of planning to kill lots of people has EVER come out and said “yep we planned to use high altitude EMPs to disable large chunks of electronics””

It was in the Soviet War Plan to do exactly that.


69 posted on 02/04/2016 4:13:27 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: discostu; RFEngineer
EMP shots would be most effectively used to destroy civilian support around military installations before lower altitude shots and cratering shots are executed on the military installations. For terrorist nations and their intended targets, substitute builtup urban areas for military installations.

But it's true that nuclear exchanges would not cause the human race to be extinct.

NukeMap
http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

Special political interests have been lying to us about the effects of nuclear weapons. Nuclear war is much more survivable than presented in their false scenarios! Have a look at the effects of one of the most powerful warheads--warheads that will not be used, because much smaller yields are much more practical (costs, delivery, concealment for mobiles, lack of extra effects with higher yields, etc.).

http://glasstone.blogspot.com/2009/11/groupthink-and-proliferation-why.html
Declassified effects of nuclear weapons and other threats: minimizing weapons effects on civilians
Can Britain and America prevail over an alliance of Russia, China, Iran and North Korea in WWIII? American sanctions on Japan in 1940 led to Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941, so beware of the lessons of history Mr President, and get civil defense Wednesday, November 18, 2009 Evidence that inaccurate statements about weapons effects have historically caused increased threats to national security, instead of reducing them

=================================

EFFECTS OF THE EXPLOSION OF A THERMO-NUCLEAR BOMB


72 posted on 02/04/2016 4:18:25 PM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson