Okay, I think I get it. We’re the government. Obey or die. It is wholly realistic to speak of reversing the situation in terms of a shooting. You introduce the subject of a checkpoint to deflect and obfuscate, and in doing so make it clear you’re a fan of government shootings in general. Haven’t there been enough incidents of questionable government shootings of civilians in just the last two or three years alone to make you want to examine the details just a little bit closer, or are you, as I suspect, a government shooter yourself? Here we have an administration hoping for general disarmament and simultaneously sending in the shooters to control the civilians, and cheerleaders on the side bleating their support. Be careful what you wish for.
You’re off the deep end, you sound like a “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” type.