@HillaryClinton That includes you, Hillary.
Posted on 01/20/2016 8:47:55 AM PST by Starman417
We've said it before. The Clinton's do not believe rules are for them. They think they're better and smarter than everyone else. They're insatiably avaricious. They're dishonest. Let's review her email lies:
Hillary Clinton, March 2015Clinton had more than 1300 emails containing classified intelligence on her private unsecured server. Now another shoe drops. Â Hillary Clinton had emails on her private server that are not just classified, but are considered above top secret."I did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail. There is no classified material."
"I'm certainly well aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material."
July 25, 2015:
"I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received."
EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton's emails on her unsecured, homebrew server contained intelligence from the U.S. government's most secretive and highly classified programs, according to an unclassified letter from a top inspector general to senior lawmakers.Not one or two- "several dozen" were on the server, including "SAP's:Fox News exclusively obtained the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP).
That indicates a level of classification beyond even "top secret," the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings even more scrutiny to the presidential candidate's handling of the government's closely held secrets.
Intelligence from a "special access program," or SAP, is even more sensitive than that designated as "top secret" – as were two emails identified last summer in a random sample pulled from Clinton's private server she used as secretary of state. Access to a SAP is restricted to those with a "need-to-know" because exposure of the intelligence would likely reveal the source, putting a method of intelligence collection -- or a human asset -- at risk. Currently, some 1,340 emails designated "classified" have been found on Clinton's server, though the Democratic presidential candidate insists the information was not classified at the time.I can't wait for her to explain how an SAP could not be "classified." That begs the question- how did this kind of sensitive material get onto her server? We know,though, don't we? She had someone strip the classified markings and then send them to her from a nonsecure server. They could not have come directly from State, because the State Department is not connected to the outside world. Clinton herself told us in an email how she wanted things:
"If they can't, turn into nonpaper [with] no identifying heading and send nonsecure."Someone had to take the SAP information, digitally copy it in house and then send to Clinton's nonsecure server via nonsecure portals. The person who did that has committed a serious crime. As for Hillary, what she did is worse than what David Petraeus did.
According to court documents, former CIA Director David Petraeus was prosecuted for sharing intelligence from special access programs with his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell. At the heart of his prosecution was a non-disclosure agreement where Petraeus agreed to protect these closely held government programs, with the understanding "unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention or negligent handling … could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation." Clinton signed an identical non-disclosure agreement Jan. 22, 2009.Paula Broadwell had the security clearance to see the information she was given. Clinton's personal IT guy did not. I doubt Clinton's pals Mills and Abedin had top secret clearance either.
This makes Hillary's recent words very poignant:
"There should be no bank too big to fail and no individual too big to jail."Indeed. Hilary's smugness was met with some particularly sharp responses:
@HillaryClinton Does this include yourself? #possibleindictment
This comes on the heels of the revelation that in 2011 Hillary aides resisted the suggestion from the State Department that Hillary use a government email system instead of her shaky set-up.@HillaryClinton "No individual too big to jail" - I can't believe she just tweeted that with a straight face
About Hillary having above Top secret information on her private server the Obama administration had......nothing to say.
"[The report] makes an allegation that concerns a former secretary, and therefore I think it's a reasonable thing to ask you about. Are you in a position to say anything about whether you believe there may have been information classified at that level, which I gather is beyond top secret on her home email server, or deny it, you know?" Mohammed asked.Kirby is a complete and total embarrassment to the military.Kirby again declined to say whether Clinton sent SAPÂ information on her server.
"I'm not in a position to comment any more than what I’ve already done here. I'm afraid I'm going to have to leave it at how I left it," Kirby said.
I am looking forward to our liberal friends attempt to dismiss this as nothing.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
I will wager a dozen donuts to one that she stays out of jail and somebody else takes the fall. The biggest question is who that will be.
The “JUST US” Dept. will NEVER indict her....they will CLER her!
Yup, it will be her ‘October surprise’
She will claim “vast right wi g conspiracy”, the media will back her up and NOTHING will come of it
Fortunately, the law that covers this does not require that it is proved that she knew or intended for classified information to be stored or transmitted from her server, nor does it require that she knew the data was or should have been classified. All it requires is that: A) classified data was sent, received or stored on her server, and that B)she caused or allowed it to happen either by design or by negligence.
Hillary treated her recipes, yoga, and wedding emails with more discretion than top secret US data.
I've never bought the argument that Obama will protect HRC at all costs. The Obamas loathe the Clintons. And as bad as the Obamas are, I don't think they (the Obamas) believe that they personally are above the rules regarding how to handle classified info. I don't see Obama lifting a finger to protect Hillary from what Donna Brazille — a loyal Dem, if ever there was one — has described as a “self-inflicted wound” of Hillary's.
I respectfully disagree. Loretta Lynch has nothing to lose by at least recommending that Obama appoint a special prosecutor.
Many freepers keep insisting, “Hillary will never get what she deserves.” Well, of course she won't get what she deserves, but there's a wide range of options between prison for life for treason (what she deserves) and the Presidency. I think HRC is going to get some form of real comeuppance this time.
Pardoned by Obama.......NOT
That is why the FBI IS TAKING ITS TIME....
NO LORETTA LUNCHBOX NO OBUMBLER TO SET HER FREE.... hahahaha
“Hillary treated her recipes, yoga, and wedding emails with more discretion than top secret US data.”
Great point! (Although I am betting that the FBI has recovered those deleted emails and that there’s much more interesting stuff in them than talk of yoga and recipes!)
AG Lynch (who the GOP helped install) has to decide to prosecute. That aint happening.
Loretta Lynch could punt and ask Obama to appoint a Special Prosecutor. HRC would NOT be happy about that...
I wish...but it’s not happening.
That picture gave me a thought. Given that the Obama and Clinton team hate each other, imagine baraq’s justice dept. prosecutes her and slick willy helps. Slick would be a happy camper with his “wife” behind bars.
In any case, laws don’t apply to Hillary unless baraq allows it. Her fate is in baraq’s hands not the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
