@HillaryClinton That includes you, Hillary.
Posted on 01/20/2016 8:47:55 AM PST by Starman417
We've said it before. The Clinton's do not believe rules are for them. They think they're better and smarter than everyone else. They're insatiably avaricious. They're dishonest. Let's review her email lies:
Hillary Clinton, March 2015Clinton had more than 1300 emails containing classified intelligence on her private unsecured server. Now another shoe drops. Â Hillary Clinton had emails on her private server that are not just classified, but are considered above top secret."I did not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail. There is no classified material."
"I'm certainly well aware of the classification requirements and did not send classified material."
July 25, 2015:
"I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received."
EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton's emails on her unsecured, homebrew server contained intelligence from the U.S. government's most secretive and highly classified programs, according to an unclassified letter from a top inspector general to senior lawmakers.Not one or two- "several dozen" were on the server, including "SAP's:Fox News exclusively obtained the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP).
That indicates a level of classification beyond even "top secret," the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings even more scrutiny to the presidential candidate's handling of the government's closely held secrets.
Intelligence from a "special access program," or SAP, is even more sensitive than that designated as "top secret" – as were two emails identified last summer in a random sample pulled from Clinton's private server she used as secretary of state. Access to a SAP is restricted to those with a "need-to-know" because exposure of the intelligence would likely reveal the source, putting a method of intelligence collection -- or a human asset -- at risk. Currently, some 1,340 emails designated "classified" have been found on Clinton's server, though the Democratic presidential candidate insists the information was not classified at the time.I can't wait for her to explain how an SAP could not be "classified." That begs the question- how did this kind of sensitive material get onto her server? We know,though, don't we? She had someone strip the classified markings and then send them to her from a nonsecure server. They could not have come directly from State, because the State Department is not connected to the outside world. Clinton herself told us in an email how she wanted things:
"If they can't, turn into nonpaper [with] no identifying heading and send nonsecure."Someone had to take the SAP information, digitally copy it in house and then send to Clinton's nonsecure server via nonsecure portals. The person who did that has committed a serious crime. As for Hillary, what she did is worse than what David Petraeus did.
According to court documents, former CIA Director David Petraeus was prosecuted for sharing intelligence from special access programs with his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell. At the heart of his prosecution was a non-disclosure agreement where Petraeus agreed to protect these closely held government programs, with the understanding "unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention or negligent handling … could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation." Clinton signed an identical non-disclosure agreement Jan. 22, 2009.Paula Broadwell had the security clearance to see the information she was given. Clinton's personal IT guy did not. I doubt Clinton's pals Mills and Abedin had top secret clearance either.
This makes Hillary's recent words very poignant:
"There should be no bank too big to fail and no individual too big to jail."Indeed. Hilary's smugness was met with some particularly sharp responses:
@HillaryClinton Does this include yourself? #possibleindictment
This comes on the heels of the revelation that in 2011 Hillary aides resisted the suggestion from the State Department that Hillary use a government email system instead of her shaky set-up.@HillaryClinton "No individual too big to jail" - I can't believe she just tweeted that with a straight face
About Hillary having above Top secret information on her private server the Obama administration had......nothing to say.
"[The report] makes an allegation that concerns a former secretary, and therefore I think it's a reasonable thing to ask you about. Are you in a position to say anything about whether you believe there may have been information classified at that level, which I gather is beyond top secret on her home email server, or deny it, you know?" Mohammed asked.Kirby is a complete and total embarrassment to the military.Kirby again declined to say whether Clinton sent SAPÂ information on her server.
"I'm not in a position to comment any more than what I’ve already done here. I'm afraid I'm going to have to leave it at how I left it," Kirby said.
I am looking forward to our liberal friends attempt to dismiss this as nothing.
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
Server? What server? We only used it to trade recipes. Nothing secret about that.
This is very serious and she needs to go to jail. Unfortunately, Donald Trump just gave Hillary a huge pass on this by saying that the Cruz campaigns minor paperwork error was a bigger deal.
If she isn’t sent to Supermax in Colorado there is no justice.
Whoever cut and paste....will be dragged into some fed court with FBI evidence presented. It won’t be Hillary....but one or two of her underdogs. Failure to do so....means everyone in the future would get a free get-out-of-jail card and their lawyer would cite this episode as a reason for the judge to just let them ride free.
Don’t worry....Hillary is not smart enough to cut and paste....so she won’t be accused of any issue on this deal.
It’s all Huma’s fault.
This has always bugged me. Does it really matter when it became classified if the intel ended up in foreign hands by reason of her decision to store said intel on a non-secure server?
She ‘outed’ a mole and a black op....
.....I think she’s going down.
Here is a link to a video where Donald Trump goes way off the rails and gives Hillary a free pass by saying that Ted Cruz’s paperword error was worse than Hillary Clinton. That quote is at the end of the short video I am linking. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NtpbWK5Kdg
“And send nonsecure”
She told us she didn’t understand all that security stuff.
What a filthy, stinking, lying, thieving, killing, dirty little snot she is.
She committed espionage and people get hung for that.
This is not new in formation - was disclosed near the beginning of this flap.
I think it’s interesting that the Obama Administration is suddenly revisiting the General David Petraeus scandal and talking about additional punishment four years after the fact. Petraeus’ mishandling of classified information pales in comparison to what Hillary has done. How can they justify punishing him further, while at the same time, give Hillary a pass? Maybe they have no intention of letting Hillary off the hook. Maybe they are using Petraeus to say to her “we’re coming after you next.”
“This is very serious and she needs to go to jail.”
Yes, it is. And yes, yes she does.
But, I’m afraid it’s reached the point where some close Hillaryites will be throwing themselves on their own swords in an effort to shield her from harm.
Or...GETTING thrown on their own swords. The only good witness, is a dead witness.
I hope justice will be done.
“I never said that I didn’t send above Top Secret emails from that server, only that I didn’t send Top Secret emails from there. Had you asked me about above Top Secret emails, I would have told you gladly.”
The FBI will issue a referral for prosecution, and the DOJ will respond, “ We will take this under advisement”, and it will slowly disappear.
Do we smell Huma Abadin here? ... well, ‘I’m not sayin it was aliens, but it was aliens.’
Your and other commenters give her the benefit of way too much doubt. It's not simply that really clever hackers were as a result of her expedient negligence able to steal things from her non-secure server(s). If that were the extent of her "incompetent" nefariousness, how would so many scores of millions of dollars flow into the Clinton Foundation coffers? That happens only in the case of her passing the super-secret stuff onto unauthorized persons by her treasonous avarice and lust for power. America literally has been sold down the river by someone that wants even more, the power of the presidency!
HF
In law, there’s what you know and what you can prove. proving that would be delicious but I’m sure she has covered her tracks well.
I wish you would re-phrase that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
