Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Greetings_Puny_Humans

” Even the founding fathers— not all of whom were born in the US— were grandfathered in as natural born citizens by special act.”

Not true. The “grandfather clause” allowed naturalized citizens to become President since many of them had fought in the Revolution. You need to do some studying, preferably somewhere other than at Vattel worship sites.

“It does not follow that anyone could be declared a “natural born citizen” by an act of congress. It would destroy its meaning.”

Not true. The meaning of “natural born subject” was defined by Parliament, and changed by Parliament several times. Since it is the basis for the meaning of NBC - having been used interchangeably with it, and as long since ruled by the Supreme Court - the definition of NBC could be adjusted by the legislature, unless the Constitution forbade it. And it did not.

That WAS the original understanding by the people who drafted the Constitution and who approved it.

The right to bear “arms”, in 1787, meant muskets. It now means certain guns, but not bombs or missiles. It does not include ALL guns, which is why the assault weapon banned was ruled legal. The definition of “arms” is subject to Congress, and we are not limited to the arms used in 1787.

Unless the Constitution said otherwise, the accepted meaning of NBC included the right to define it by the legislature. And the Constitution did not say otherwise. So yeah, Congress has the right, which it has used very gently, only adding that citizenship can pass thru the mother’s side if the mother has spent enough time living in the USA.


83 posted on 01/12/2016 7:28:32 AM PST by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers
Not true. The meaning of “natural born subject” was defined by Parliament, and changed by Parliament several times.

I'm not sure why you insist on making all these inane comments. If the founding fathers wanted Congress to have the power to change the meaning of natural born citizen, then they would have given them that power in the Constitution. Saying that "parliament" could do it is stupid. FYI, "The common law of England is not the common law of these States." –George Mason

and as long since ruled by the Supreme Court

Oh, so you have a Supreme Court case that declares that a child born to a woman who is an American citizen is a natural born citizen, regardless of where he is born? I should like to see this.

84 posted on 01/12/2016 8:24:33 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson