Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke

True since the SoS is one of many who deems what is classified and not classifed. It becomes an issues if the classification guide indicates what is classified.


16 posted on 01/09/2016 8:56:16 AM PST by Perdogg (Senator Ted Cruz - President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Perdogg

“True since the SoS is one of many who deems what is classified and not classifed. It becomes an issues if the classification guide indicates what is classified.”

It’s not a matter of classification or of security classification guides. I’ve always been taught in numerous classes going back to the 1970s, that a commander can authorize the transmission of classified information in the clear if that commander deems it necessary to completion of his mission and that the benefits of such a transmission outweigh the costs.

My point was, if a Captain in the Army has this kind of authority, then I’m pretty sure SecState does as well.

I want to add, we were always taught that the authority to transmit in the clear was something that should be used sparingly because you would have to justify such a transmission and you really were in a “you bet your bars” situation. IOW, you damn well better be right.


34 posted on 01/09/2016 10:17:02 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson