First of all, just so we're clear on it: I totally agree with you that Dems are hoping to destroy the US military as an effective fighting force.
Social welfare, political correctness and quotas by group are what they want, winning wars is the last thing on their minds, and even the draft itself, when Dems propose it, is intended as a tool for destroying military cohesiveness.
In Democrat ideology, the perfect, ideal, model soldier is, yes, of course, "Sgt." Bo Bergdahl.
That's who they want more and more of.
No argument on that.
That's why I believe there will not be another military draft short of World War Three, and if/when that happens, we will be looking at mass casualties on a scale beyond even WWII numbers.
It will then be "all citizen to your battle stations", including whomever is qualified to do the job -- male, female, whatever.
So I consider what's happening today an experiment, one which will either confirm or falsify the hypothesis that some women can be fit, trained and qualified to serve in active combat units.
In a few years, we'll learn how well it works.
If gender-integrated units do prove capable in actual combat, then I don't have a problem with it.
Women serving in combat is idiotic.
Stop pushing the lefts agenda.
I will always have a problem with women in combat. The military is no place for social experiments.