[tacticalogic]

tacticalogic, common sense will tell us that tissue does not stay soft for millions of years, it decays. Evolutionists want to say that carbon testing proves that it is millions of years old, yet carbon testing has been proven to be inaccurate. So in dating the soft tissue found, is it logical or scientific to assume it is eons old just because we have been brainwashed by evolutionists to think evolution is more than just a THEORY?

Can you please provide a source for that? The half-life of C-14 is less than 6,000 years, and generally considered useless for dating anything beyond about 70,000 years. If there are any "evolutionists" asserting that "carbon testing" proves that it's "millions of years old" I'd like names and sources because they need to be called out on it.

[Apple Pan Dowdy]

tacticalogic, so then you agree that dinosaur bones are not millions of years old? If it is not the carbon dating then what proof is it that they point to to claim that dinosaurs all died out before man came upon the earth?