Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01

Trump will likely have a lot of people who don’t normally vote republican voting for him which is something Romney did not have. Romney was not a candidate that got people excited and Trump arguably is. I don’t see Hillary as being very exciting for democrats or getting as many people out to vote for her as Obama did.


45 posted on 11/01/2015 2:18:35 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: jospehm20; CottonBall
I understand where you are coming from, though I believe you both are a little sanguine about your "new Republican turnout" due to Trump. There is no doubt, though, that this effect will be in play...to some degree.

At the same time, I believe you are under-estimating the stay-at-home Republican vote that would be attributable to a Trump nomination. As a veteran of the Goldwater campaign, I'm acutely sensitive to how little support -- in terms of money, on the ground action and actual votes -- an anti-establishment GOP candidate can receive.

This effect, too, will be in play...to some degree.

That's not to say the very same effects wouldn't be in play with a Cruz candidacy.

Thus, both Trump and Cruz are risky candidates. But I would a helluva lot rather take my chances with Trump or Cruz than with Bush or, say, Kasich.

55 posted on 11/01/2015 3:10:12 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: . IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson