Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
"If the federal courts are going to uphold it, there's not much we can do about it. It is effectively the law."

Laws are produced by legislation. The states all have current law in regards to marriage. These current laws still stand. A court "ruling" is only applicable to those whose case is before the court. What you refer to as "effective law" does not exist, as court rulings have variables due to the individual nature of each case being litigated. We need to FORCE those who wish to impose their will on us to do so one case at a time rather than concede to their argument that somehow by magic, the Supreme Court can legislate. We need to act according to OUR argument rather than react to theirs.

107 posted on 09/05/2015 1:20:58 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Sham

Roe v Wade

Other civil rights rulings...

We can argue “the law” point and I would probably agree with you. Effectively the SCOTUS has ruled, and we now have a legal finding that is going to be applied.

While we argue the finer points, the courts are moving ahead.

I am trying to address the reality of it. If I used some grammatically incorrect terms, I think you know what I mean enough for us to understand where each other are coming from.


111 posted on 09/05/2015 1:28:02 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson