Posted on 08/16/2015 11:25:16 AM PDT by markomalley
It says that Prescott Bush, who is the father of George H. W. Bush, and the grandfather of George W. Bush and JEB!, was the Treasurer for Planned Parenthood during their first nationwide campaign for donations. It is Prescott Bush’s name that is circled on that document.
The Bushes should confront their racist ancestry in an honest way. Jeb not saving Terri Schiavo (ie: an expendable human being?), when seen in the light of his heritage, is even more disturbing.
Prescott Bush was George Herbert Walker Bush’s father. He went to Yale, was a Skull and Bones and best friend of Averill Harriman. Accused of planning a coup against FDR by Smedley Butler (Mag Gen in WW1 and only 2 time congressional medal of honor winner - and he lived through it all). Prescott married up into the Walker family and named his first son after his father-in-law, George Herbert Walker.
Funded Nazi’s, had his bank taken away by the Government and much more.
Oh, and a leader in the Eugenics movement. You know, typical progressive kind of stuff...
It was reading two people who don’t like each other, Jonah Goldberg and Ann Coulter, that made me switch sides on the abortion issue. Especially chilling was Jonah Goldberg’s thumbnail biography of Margaret Sanger where Mr. Goldberg stated that Margaret Sanger wanted to use birth control to cut down on the black population. And what did Margaret Sanger think of abortion to cut down the black population? She considered abortion horrific and barbaric even for what she considered the inferior black race. Reading that for the first time sent chills up my spine (see Goldberg’s “Liberal Fascism”).
Eugenics as the global warming of its day.
Many high profile people and politicians were on board and those who were not were accused of being ‘anti-science’.
Everything really does coma around.
Coma around. A sleeper issue? (Duck’n & runn’n)
The only thing that's new in this world, is the history you don't know. - Harry Truman
Margaret Sanger's viewpoint was shared by her Nazi contemporaries.
Hermann Gauch was a famous Nazi race theorist, identified with what was termed, Nordic Theory. In his Basis for Race ResearchNeve Grundlagen Zur Rassenforschung (1935):
The non-Nordics and the animals [are] just about next to the anthropoid ape. He is therefore not a complete man. He is really not a man at all in the true counter-distinction to animals, but a transition, an intermediate stage, better and more apt is the designation, subhuman untermench.
If non-Nordics are more closely allied with monkeys and apes than to Nordics, why is it possible for them to mate with Nordics and not apes? The answer is this: It has not been proved that non-Nordics cannot mate with apes.
We have 80% of Planned Parenthood clinics located adjacent to or within the black community today, vivisecting and selling the unborn for "research". Where did the eugenicists of a century ago go for their specimens?
The African colonies and concentration camps also served racial scientific inquiry. Post-mortems were performed to study causes of death and bodies of executed prisoners were preserved and shipped to Germany for dissection.
A 1907 chronicle reported that: "A chest of Herero skulls was recently sent to the Pathological Institute in Berlin, where they will be subjected to scientific measurements.
Probably the most well-known study was the physician Eugen Fishers evaluation of Basters, the mixed-blood children of Dutch men and Nama women. He argued that "Negro blood" was of "lesser value" and that mixing it with "white blood" would destroy European culture, and advised that Africans should be exploited by Europeans as long they were useful, after which they could be eliminated.
(as quoted from "German science and black racismroots of the Nazi Holocaustby François Haas, The FASEB Journal. 2008;22:332-337 (New York University Institute of Community Health and Research, New York University School of Medicine, NY, NY)
And remarkably there are still faux "intellectuals" hanging around who insist that Darwin's writings had nothing to do with cultivating this perspective.
"At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes [i.e., blacks ed.], as Professor Schaffhausen has remarked, (Anthropological Review, April, 1867, p. 236) will no doubt be exterminated."
As Harvard's late Steven J. Gould put it:
"Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1850, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory. The litany is familiar: cold, dispassionate, objective, modern science shows us that races can be ranked on a scale of superiority.
If this offends Christian morality or a sentimental belief in human unity, so be it; science must be free to proclaim unpleasant truths. But the data were worthless If the chorus of racist arguments did not follow a constraint of data, it must have reflected social prejudice pure and simple ."
(as quoted from Stephen Jay Gould, "Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Belknap-Harvard Press," 1977, page 127128.)
Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together.
FReegards!
lol, that post was a mess.
I really should pay more attention before I hit POST
Jeb, George 1, George 2 and the rest of that clan have got to renounce their ancestor for his racist views. Any ill-gotten profits Prescott made off racist endeavors are blood money.
Thanks for your research !
Dr Ben was very clever when on Cavuto last week. He gave a bit of introduction with facts. When pressed he invited all to do more research on their own.
Since some of their outreach is in local libraries am wondering if contribution of books on the subject would be in order
Agree with that.
As GWB was leaving office he was interviewed by Cynthia McFadden who asked Bush if the Bible was literally true. "You know. Probably not. ... No, I'm not a literalist, but I think you can learn a lot from it, but I do think that the New Testament for example is ... has got ... You know, the important lesson is 'God sent a son,'" Bush said.
With "Christian" family leadership like this is there any wonder when we learned the truth about Laura in 2010?
"Laura Bush Supports Gay Marriage, Abortion" May 12, 2010, By RUSSELL GOLDMAN (per ABC News):
"Former first lady Laura Bush has broken with her husband on the premier social issues of his administration and said she backs gay marriage and abortion.
After more than eight years of silence on the controversial issues, Mrs. Bush said in an interview with CNN's Larry King Tuesday, that gay marriage and abortion were points of contention with her husband, former President George W. Bush.
Mrs. Bush in recent weeks has been promoting her memoir "Spoken from the Heart," in which she writes about her life both before and after becoming first lady.
Phonies -- all of them.
FReegards!
You are most welcome.
This is taken from an adult Sunday School series I have prepared and delivered entitled "Darwin's Plantation: Evolution's Racist Roots" based in part on the book of the same title co-authored by Ken Ham and Charles Ware (2008)
FReegards!
Every person in the country should be compelled to read your post,no exceptions.
Did Sanger and Hitler ever meet?
Did Sanger and Hitler ever meet?
There is no evidence that they ever met...but one can discern that Sanger's belief in eugenics certainty found an audience with Hitler.
Margaret Sanger, Mother of Planned Parenthood, pro-abortionist and American Eugenics
Excepts
Abortion clinics were originally set up with the intention of slowing the population growth of Afro-Americans and others racial groups considered mentally or otherwise inferior."Lothrop Stoddard was on the board of directors (of Margaret Sanger's Population Association of America) for years.... He had an interview with Adolf Hitler and was very impressed. His book, The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy, was written while he served on Sanger's board. Havelock Ellis, one of Sanger's extra-marital lovers, reviewed this..book favorably in The Birth Control Review".
At a March,1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.
Another link between Margaret Sanger, American Eugenicist and Adolf Hitler, Eugenics practitioner:
"The leaders in the German sterilization movement state repeatedly that their legislation was formulated after careful study of the California experiment as reported by Mr. Gosney and Dr. [Paul] Popenoe. It would have been impossible, they say, to undertake such a venture involving some 1 million people without drawing heavily upon previous experience elsewhere." Who is Dr. Paul Popenoe? He was a leader in the U.S. eugenics movement and wrote (1933) the article 'Eugenic Sterilization' in the journal (BCR) that Margaret Sanger started. How many Americans did Dr. Popenoe estimate should be subjected to sterilization? Between five million and ten million Americans. "The situation [in the U.S.A] will grow worse instead of better if steps are not taken to control the reproduction of mentally handicapped. Eugenic sterilization represents one such step that is practicable, humanitarian, and certain in its results."
Lothrop Stoddard was a Harvard PhD who actually visited Nazi Germany and visited a German court which decided which people would be involuntarily sterilized. Far from being scandalized, he thought they were too conservative in their opinions: he said that the eugenics laws were being administered with strict regard for its provisions and that, if anything, judgments were almost too conservative, and that the law was weeding out the worst strains in the Germanic stock in a scientific and truly humanitarian way. (Yes, its from Wikipedia, but the quotes are linked to books from Oxford University Press and University of Vermont press, with ISBNs which check out. Incidentally, the photo of Stoddard on Wikipedia bears an uncanny resemblance to Snidely Whiplash.)
Born premature at 22 weeks, identical twins are sharing the truth about abortion
August 6, 2015, Ellis decided to share their photograph with the world through Facebook. Underneath the photo she wrote:
With all this talk of abortion right now, I want people to know that this is what a 22 week old child looks like. This was just minutes after my twins passed away after living and breathing for about 30 minutes last November (Chase, the one on the right, looks different because he was in the sac without amniotic fluid for a couple days). It is legal to abort children at this age in way too many places. While I was holding my babies, wishing they would survive, babies at the same gestation that could have survived are being torn apart and discarded. It makes my heart sad. There are so many better options (adoption being my personal favorite). These are precious children of God. I love you Chase and Cooper, and I hope someone will see this and reconsider their choice.
http://liveactionnews.org/miscarried-22-weeks-identical-twins-sharing-truth-abortion/
Thanks for your posts and ping, Agamemnon. Thread BUMP!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.