Posted on 07/09/2015 12:35:09 PM PDT by Starman417
Because she can't stop lying.
Her highness Hillary Clinton, feeling her heels being nipped at by the little Communist Chihuahua from Vermont, deigned to grant the proletariat an interview. Over at Politico, Sacco and Vendetti, er, I mean Karni and Debenedetti, hilariously described the interview as "confronting the enemy."
The "enemy" was Brianna Keilar:
Brianna Keilar, recently attended the wedding of Mrs. Clinton’s “director of grassroots engagement” to an erstwhile staffer for the Ready for Hillary Super PAC.In the interview Hillary Clinton stated as a matter of fact:
“People should and do trust me.”
In that same interview Hillary offered concrete proof why no one should trust her on anything.
The select committee's release came one day after Clinton, the presumed Democratic front-runner for president, said in her first national-television interview of the campaign that she "never had a subpoena."Within minutes Hillary Clinton was proven to be a flaming liar. Trey Gowdy released a subpoena issued to Hillary on March 4. You can read it here. The Washington Post shamelessly tried to spin this turn of events and deflect from Hillary's mendacity."I've never had a subpoena. There is — again, let's take a deep breath here. Everything I did was permitted by law and regulation," Clinton said in the CNN interview.
"Trey Gowdy releases his subpoena of Hillary Clinton in attempt to contradict her"
"In an attempt to contradict her." Their article ought to read "Hillary caught lying her ass off" but this is the Washington Post. It, along with the NY Slimes, is an arm of the DNC and protector of all things Clinton. The author is Colby Itkowitz. Take note, so you can dismiss anything she writes from here on.
A note of interest: The article at The Hill was scrubbed from its original version this morning to remove the words "I've never had a subpoena."
Curious.
Or maybe not. Clinton lied numerous times in the interview
Clinton said in the CNN interview that there was "no law" or regulation that did not give her "full authority" to decide how she wanted to communicate as secretary of state. But Gowdy said Clinton had a "statutory duty" to preserve records from her entire tenure as secretary of state. Clinton revealed in March that she deleted about 30,000 emails from her time in office, describing them as "personal" and saying she had "no reason to keep them."And of course
"I had one device."CNN: "Source: Clinton used iPad for personal email at State"
And I cannot let this go without reminding that it was Clinton herself who said that the use of secret email accounts was "shredding the Constitution."
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
Being an attorney...everything she says is crafted so she can have a way out later...”what I meant was...” She never answers the question straightforward... All that is important is that “ it’s time for a woman president”
She can’t pass the smell test.
Billary....many time winner national language parsing championships.
Smells fishy :)
If it weren’t so tragic it would be funny seeing her emerge from her La-La Land den and scurry back when any light is visible like a woodchuck.
IMO, her desire to be POTUS is neurotic. She isn’t qualified; she wants the power.
And if you don't believe that you will after reprogramming.
If you have to TELL people you’re honest... you’ re not.
It’s sort of like a whore TELLING you she’s a lady....
Just needed to fix that misspelling in the article.
Her highness Hillary Clinton
Her heinous Hillary Clinton
Fishy? Nah. Something’s rotten in her Denmark.
I don’t care how many speech, image consultants she has, she’s unlikeable/untrustworthy/unauthentic..comes off as the elitist hag that she is. No wonder the campaign wants to keep her in the bunker, this interview is proof that she doesn’t have what it takes & never will.
Lipstick on a pig.
Or, Her Lieness Hillary Clinton
I predict that the air in Hillary’s balloon is going to be let out when Joe Biden announces that he’s running.
Hillary: “I have a vagina. Don’t make me prove it.”
“The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons.” Ralph Waldo Emerson
Clearly she is a poor attorney if that is her plan. She can't speak for more than a few sentences with out spewing an easily provable lie. She really needs to avoid additional interviews.
She will NEVER be in the debates. None. You can say at that point, ‘oh well she dropped out of the race’ or whatever. But there will never be a debate with her in it.
I am just saying
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.