[Vanity + Fox News Video] Clinton Not 'Personally Involved' in Russian Uranium Deal?

http://video.foxnews.com/v/4316027298001/clinton-not-personally-involved-in-russian-uranium-deal/?#sp=show-clips ^ | June 23, 2015 | Laura Ingraham

[lbryce]

This tubby, rubenesque sack of potatoes once again manages to get her grubby smelly fingers involved again in some national emergency. The report is that America has given Russia 20% of our uranium supply. Again.The report is that America has given Russia 20% of our uranium supply.

It may be part of some clandestine Iranian deal. But still giving away 20% of our uranium is rather irresponsible even for Obama but remember he was elected twice. It still sounds far fetched that its part of some Iranian deal but still Hil-liar's grubby, smelly hands are supposedly all over it.

[lbryce]

geiger counter glow in the dark ping list

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

And he did not have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky either. Statements that are in his view “technically true” are often actually false.

[gaijin]

You know what is SOUNDS like..?

It sounds like the Uranium transfer went like THIS:

USA —> Russia —> Iran

With THIS administration when you think you’ve had BAD thrown in your lap, you should think WORSE or WORST.

There’s MORE to this.

THERE IS MORE.

[lbryce]

That’s what I said in the story.

[gaijin]

BATF Mexican machine-guns: “Meh, it was a botched plan from a local, outlying office in Arizona....”

IRS political terror: “Hey, bureaucratic SNAFU, isolated incident in the Cincinatti office, shucks..! Mulligan, maybe..? Sorry guys..!”

HOW IS *THIS* TIME EVEN ONE IOTA DIFFERENT..?

[ETL]

Open Mic Catches Obama Asking Medvedev for Space on Missile Defense
March 26, 2012

"In a private conversation about the planned U.S.-led NATO missile defense system in Europe, President Barack Obama asked outgoing Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for space on the issue.

“This is my last election,” Obama told Medvedev. “After my election I have more flexibility.”

“I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir,” Medvedev said, referring to incoming President Vladimir Putin."

http://fox8.com/2012/03/26/open-mic-catches-obama-asking-medvedev-for-space-on-missile-defense/
__________________________________________________

Obama was talking with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev when neither of them realized that their conversation was being picked up by microphones. Here is what they said:

Obama: “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space.”

Medvedev: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ...”

Obama: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”

Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”

“This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” That statement tells us much about the president’s mindset.

The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration. Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president’s comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.

In addition, there is the phrase “on all these issues,” implying more is at stake than just missile defense.”

Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn’t be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/

Open Mic Catches Obama Asking Medvedev for Space on Missile Defense
March 26, 2012

"In a private conversation about the planned U.S.-led NATO missile defense system in Europe, President Barack Obama asked outgoing Russian President Dmitry Medvedev for space on the issue.

“This is my last election,” Obama told Medvedev. “After my election I have more flexibility.”

“I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir,” Medvedev said, referring to incoming President Vladimir Putin."

http://fox8.com/2012/03/26/open-mic-catches-obama-asking-medvedev-for-space-on-missile-defense/
__________________________________________________

Obama was talking with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev when neither of them realized that their conversation was being picked up by microphones. Here is what they said:

Obama: “On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space.”

Medvedev: “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ...”

Obama: “This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility.”

Medvedev: “I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir.”

“This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” That statement tells us much about the president’s mindset.

The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration. Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president’s comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.

In addition, there is the phrase “on all these issues,” implying more is at stake than just missile defense.”

Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn’t be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/

[ETL]

Obama To Betray Missile Defense Secrets To Moscow
Investor's Business Daily ^ | January 9, 2012 | IBD staff

Appeasement: From ObamaCare to recess appointments, honoring the Constitution has not been an administration hallmark. But when it comes to betraying secrets to mollify the Russians, it becomes a document the president hides behind.

It was bad enough that the 2012 defense authorization bill signed by President Obama set America on a downward spiral of military mediocrity.

He also issued a signing statement, something he once opposed, saying that language in the bill aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on the U.S. Standard Missile-3 — linchpin of our missile defense — might impinge on his constitutional foreign-policy authority.

Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they'd be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.

The president is required to certify that any technology shared will not be passed on to third parties such as China, North Korea or Iran, that the Russians will not use transferred secrets to develop countermeasures and that the Russians are reciprocating in sharing missile-defense technology.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...

Obama To Betray Missile Defense Secrets To Moscow
Investor's Business Daily ^ | January 9, 2012 | IBD staff

Appeasement: From ObamaCare to recess appointments, honoring the Constitution has not been an administration hallmark. But when it comes to betraying secrets to mollify the Russians, it becomes a document the president hides behind.

It was bad enough that the 2012 defense authorization bill signed by President Obama set America on a downward spiral of military mediocrity.

He also issued a signing statement, something he once opposed, saying that language in the bill aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on the U.S. Standard Missile-3 — linchpin of our missile defense — might impinge on his constitutional foreign-policy authority.

Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they'd be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.

The president is required to certify that any technology shared will not be passed on to third parties such as China, North Korea or Iran, that the Russians will not use transferred secrets to develop countermeasures and that the Russians are reciprocating in sharing missile-defense technology.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...

[Jimmy Valentine]

Objection. Hillary is anything but “Reubenesque” Reuben’s never painted porcine bags of suet

[Liz]

HAT TIP--NY POST OP-ED BY AUTHOR SCHWEIZER
Clinton Cash author demolishes Hillary’s self-defense

Hillary was asked why her State Dept greenlit the transfer of 20% of strategic US uranium to the Russians. Clinton claimed she had no involvement..."...it wasn’t something the secretary of state did.” Beyond being an admission of extreme executive negligence on an issue of utmost national security, Hillary’s statement strains credulity for these reasons:

First, nine investors who profited from the uranium deal collectively donated $145 million to the Clinton Foundation, including mega-donor and Canadian mining billionaire Frank Giustra, who pledged $100 million. Giustra and Bill Clinton frequently globetrot, and formed the Clinton-Giustra Initiative.

Asked about the Kremlin-backed bank that paid Bill an astonishing $500,000 for a single speech in Moscow, Hillary offered a blurry evasion. “It happened in terms of the support for the foundation before I was secretary of state.”

Yet, the Times confirms the gargantuan fee was pocketed, “shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One.” Plus----at the time Hillary’s State Dept was considering the Uranium One deal, Uranium One’s then-chief Ian Telfer donated $2.35 million that the Clinton foundation kept hidden.

Hillary notes that “nine US government agencies signed off on that deal.”.....but she was the only US agency signoff w/ $145 million from uranium shareholders.

Hillary wishes these questions would vanish. But that’s unlikely. The RNC finds that the US uranium transfer is “the most persuasive message tested” and one that “severely undercuts her perceived strength of resume.”

American voters are left to ponder Hillary's involvement in US uranium now in Vladimir Putin's hands: She's either dangerously incompetent or deeply dishonest.

SOURCE http://nypost.com/2015/06/22/clinton-cash-author-demolishes-hillarys-self-defense/

[Liz]

ook at 'er.

She's the picture-perfect image of a "public nuisance".....
a troublesome angry woman. What used to be known as
a "Common Scold".....a nuisance to the public peace.

The querolous Hillary wagging her finger, berating
Americans for actually achieving the American Dream.

VOTERS NEED TO REJECT POWER-HUNGRY HILLARY: It's nauseating that the grotesque Clintons want to get back into power. The get-rick-quick Clintons are still not satisfied. The want access to our tax dollars to pay-off their donors and business partners.