Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The insanity of ‘free trade’ agreements (ed. As in you must pass it before you can read it)
Washington Times ^ | March 17, 2014 | Judson Phillips

Posted on 06/12/2015 8:58:01 AM PDT by concernedcitizen76

Paul Ryan, Boehner, McConnell et al.

Over the weekend an anniversary was marked with little fanfare — the second anniversary of the implementation of the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement.

The U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement passed with the usual fanfare, supported by the usual suspects. Barack Obama hailed the agreement’s implementation on March 15, 2012. In the middle of his re-election campaign, he cheerfully promised the agreement would increase American exports to South Korea by $10 billion and would create 70,000 U.S. jobs.

One of Barack Obama’s signature efforts for his second term is the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a trade deal among the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Peru, Chile, New Zealand, Australia, Malaysia, Singapore, Brunei, Vietnam and Japan.

Most people would expect Obama, in the middle of a fight over the fate of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, to be trumpeting the successes of the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement.

There is a reason for Obama’s silence.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: agitprop; betrayal; boehner; insanity; paultardation; paultardnoisemachine; professionaltroll; putinsbuttboys; randpaulnoisemachine; randsconcerntrolls; ryan; tisa; tpa; tpp; vladtheimploder; wikileaks
In the first two years of the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement, U.S. exports to Korea fell by $3.1 billion. Meanwhile, imports from Korea increased by $8.7 billion. Studies show that, instead of increasing employment in America, approximately 60,000 jobs have been lost thanks to the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement.

Albert Einstein is quoted as saying, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.”

The U.S. has entered into a number of these so-called free trade agreements, starting with the NAFTA agreement in the early ‘90s. The results are predictable. Every time, America’s trade deficit goes up and American employment goes down.

What is the difference between conservatives and liberals?

Liberals are married to their ideology, and no matter how many times it fails, they hold the eternal hope that somehow the result will be different after they have done the same thing over and over again.

Conservatives are practical and do not hesitate to re-examine their views when evidence is presented that those views might be wrong. A great example of this is the interventionist policies of the George W. Bush administration.

Ten-plus years ago, most conservatives supported those interventionist and nation-buildingpolicies. Now, most conservatives oppose them. Barack Obama has tried to intervene in several conflicts around the world, only to find opposition from his own party and from conservatives who would have supported such action in years past.

Free trade agreements are another of those issues on which conservatives are changing.

Conservatives believe in free trade. Unfortunately, these free trade agreements have little to do with free trade. Trade concerns only two issues: Taxes and Tariffs.

Yet these free trade agreements, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership, mostly deal with other issues, not taxes and tariffs. In NAFTA, special conditions were created that gave foreign competitors benefits that U.S. companies do not have.

Unfortunately, free trade can be a dog whistle for some Republicans. As soon as they hear the words “free trade,” they run toward the agreement, no matter how bad it is.

While many Democrats in Congress have started opposing these free trade agreements, many in the Republican establishment continue to embrace them. No matter how many times these agreements have failed and backfired, the free trade wing of the Republican Party reflexively runs toward them.

Perhaps it is proof some Republicans don’t suffer from insanity. They seem to enjoy it.

1 posted on 06/12/2015 8:58:02 AM PDT by concernedcitizen76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Free Trade dies when the first shot of wwiii is fired.


2 posted on 06/12/2015 9:02:07 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76
Unfortunately, free trade can be a dog whistle for some Republicans. As soon as they hear the words “free trade,” they run toward the agreement, no matter how bad it is.

LOL

3 posted on 06/12/2015 9:02:42 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

When will this nightmare end?


4 posted on 06/12/2015 9:04:10 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Unfortunately, free trade can be a dog whistle for some Republicans. As soon as they hear the words “free trade,” they run toward the agreement, no matter how bad it is.

Fortunately for patriots the ChiComs are going to over play their hand. her are going to get in a shooting war sooner rather than later. When that happens the Free Traitors glory days are over. You don't maintain trade relationships with the enemy that is killing your sons.

5 posted on 06/12/2015 9:06:45 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

There is no way the Korean’s would make a trade agreement with the US unless they expected to export more to the US and import less. I’ve dealt with the Korean Govt on trade issues and non-tariff barriers and they laugh at our negotiators. They have no intention of allowing more US goods or services into their economy..no way.


6 posted on 06/12/2015 9:08:58 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

It’s a great line. And it paraphrases what the heroic Sen. Jeff Sessions said to Mark Levin two days ago. When asked why Republicans suppport agreemnents they haven’t even read, Sen. Jeff Sessions said that, to a number of Republicans, “free trade is a religion.” They’ll vote for anything stammped with the label “free trade.” What mindless fools these members of Congress are on both sides.


7 posted on 06/12/2015 9:10:21 AM PDT by concernedcitizen76 (Term limits. Repeal the 16th and 17th amendments. Sunset bureaucracies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Here are 7 reasons why the House of Representatives should vote NO on TPA (as stated in “7 Reasons Why Trade Promotion Authority/Fast Track Must Be Defeated” by William F. Jasper, TheNewAmerican.com, June 5, 2015):

TPA is essential to passage of the very dangerous TPP and TTIP.
TPA is a “bum’s rush” that ratifies a secret, corrupt process and aims to ratify a secret, corrupt product.
TPA is an unconscionable abdication of constitutional responsibility by Congress.
TPA not only hands power to Obama, but to his successor as well.
TPA is another giant step in the unconstitutional transfer of congressional authority to the president.
TPA also challenges the Constitution by violating the requirement that treaties be ratified by a super-majority vote of two-thirds of the U.S. Senate.
The TPA will speed the transfer of immense power to federal and international judges to eviscerate the Constitution; to strike down federal, state, and local laws; and to legislate from the bench.


8 posted on 06/12/2015 9:16:49 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Vote NO on fast track, then debate the particulars of the agreement like civilized men and women — point by point — out in the open.


9 posted on 06/12/2015 9:17:18 AM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76
Conservatives believe in free trade. Unfortunately, these free trade agreements have little to do with free trade. Trade concerns only two issues: Taxes and Tariffs. Yet these free trade agreements, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership, mostly deal with other issues, not taxes and tariffs. In NAFTA, special conditions were created that gave foreign competitors benefits that U.S. companies do not have.

Great article, which cuts through all the corporatist BS that we hear from our bribed GOP politicians.

10 posted on 06/12/2015 9:18:59 AM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Jasper forgot to include TiSA, the totally secret Trade in Services Agreement that no one can read, not even members of Congress. Wikileaks released a portion of the dreaded thing having to do with health care. In addition, people in Europe are going ballistic over the TTiP. Brussels had to postpone the vote because of the groundswell of opposition. Washington DC is a rogue beast fed by an internationalist cabal. “Consent of the governed” is meaningless to the monsters and goons in DC.


11 posted on 06/12/2015 9:39:48 AM PDT by concernedcitizen76 (Term limits. Repeal the 16th and 17th amendments. Sunset bureaucracies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
When will this nightmare end?

It will end with a letter in the mail from The Department of Health and Human Services which schedules your end-of-life counseling session for next Tuesday.

12 posted on 06/12/2015 9:41:50 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: central_va

That’s because the CEOs are blowing the whistle.


13 posted on 06/12/2015 9:43:08 AM PDT by RobbyS (quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: concernedcitizen76

Very simple concept. Never enter a free trade agreement with countries that have significant lower cost structures. You will lose every time and those countries typically do not want the hi cost and more difficult to produce products we sell. Yeah, there may be a few winning markets, but most will lose.


14 posted on 06/12/2015 11:38:21 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson