The state of Hawaii prepared Certified Letters of Verification for two states’
Chief Election Officials, the Secretaries of State in Arizona and Kansas. An additional Certified Letter of Verification was prepared for a federal judge in Mississippi and all nine judges of the Alabama Supreme Court received a copy of the Mississippi federal court letter.
At any point in time, in order to implement the constitutional imperative, any Committee of Congress could issue a congressional subpoena for the original birth certificate and require past and present Hawaii officials to answer questions under oath. Congressional subpoenas have the force of court orders.
Finally it only takes one Senator and one Representative to challenge the electors in any state by a written objection. Congress could have refused to certify Obama’s electors in enough states to take him below the 270 threshold until Congress was convinced of his birth certificate’s authenticity.
Of course with John Boehner and Mitch McConnell running the congresdional loyal opposition, that was unlikely to happen.
“The state of Hawaii says that the President was born there. That’s good enough for me.””— John Boehner on Meet The Press
None of this constitutes proof. The letters only affirm that the information is in their records. It does not establish whether that this is the ORIGINAL information in the records, or whether it was placed there at a later time.
Again, there are a lot of false equivalences allowed by Hawaiian law that other people would not allow if they were aware of them.
Being born anywhere will get you a Hawaiian birth certificate. Showing your child to a physician up to a year after he is born will get that physician's signature on the Hawaiian birth certificate. No actual birth in Hawaii is necessary.
Both of these things are contrary to people's instinctive understanding. They do not actually comply with the normal understanding of "born there", but Hawaii grants them the false equivalence of meaning the same thing under Hawaiian law.
Again, we are only interested in real meanings under Constitutional law, not fake, made up meanings under Hawaiian law. Hawaiian officials attesting to lose meanings allowed under Hawaiian law are not valid proof of anything.
“The state of Hawaii says that the President was born there. That’s good enough for me.””— John Boehner on Meet The Press
Did I mention that I thought John Boehner is an unethical idiot who isn't concerned with compliance to the rule of law?