None of this constitutes proof. The letters only affirm that the information is in their records. It does not establish whether that this is the ORIGINAL information in the records, or whether it was placed there at a later time.
Again, there are a lot of false equivalences allowed by Hawaiian law that other people would not allow if they were aware of them.
Being born anywhere will get you a Hawaiian birth certificate. Showing your child to a physician up to a year after he is born will get that physician's signature on the Hawaiian birth certificate. No actual birth in Hawaii is necessary.
Both of these things are contrary to people's instinctive understanding. They do not actually comply with the normal understanding of "born there", but Hawaii grants them the false equivalence of meaning the same thing under Hawaiian law.
Again, we are only interested in real meanings under Constitutional law, not fake, made up meanings under Hawaiian law. Hawaiian officials attesting to lose meanings allowed under Hawaiian law are not valid proof of anything.
“The state of Hawaii says that the President was born there. That’s good enough for me.””— John Boehner on Meet The Press
Did I mention that I thought John Boehner is an unethical idiot who isn't concerned with compliance to the rule of law?
“None of this constitutes proof. The letters only affirm that the information is in their records. It does not establish whether that this is the ORIGINAL information in the records, or whether it was placed there at a later time.”
It may not constitute proof to you but it did constitute proof to two elected Secretaries of State, to a federal district court judge and to the Justices of the Alabama Supreme Court.
The Letter prepared for the Secretary of state in Arizona specifically verified 12 different specific data points on the birth certificate at the request of the Scretary of State.
The law under which Certified Letters of Verification are authorized states:
“A verification shall be considered for all purposes certification that the vital event did occur and that the facts of the event are as stated by the applicant.”