Skip to comments.
Gun Turn In 'Buy Back': Homemade Shotguns for Cash
Gun Watch ^
| 13 April, 2015
| Dean Weingarten
Posted on 04/14/2015 6:54:08 AM PDT by marktwain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
To: rickomatic
41
posted on
04/14/2015 6:06:27 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
9. May I lawfully make a firearm for my own personal use, provided it is not being made for resale? Firearms may be lawfully made by persons who do not hold a manufacturers license under the GCA provided they are not for sale or distribution and the maker is not prohibited from receiving or possessing firearms.
Making a firearm. "For sale" is not the same as selling a homemade firearm. It is a subtle difference, but a difference, non the less. This has been discussed endlessly on all of the gun builder forums I've been on. No one ever had an example of someone charged with selling a "homemade" firearm. People who made and sold on a regular basis, yes. But that was because they were considered illegal manufacturers.
To: rickomatic
I doubt that the ATF will care about the subtlety.
43
posted on
04/14/2015 7:09:01 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
Thanks, I see now that the legal length mentioned in the article would imply there is a longer barrel element missing in the photo. That would facilitate the chamber and slamming action. Certainly easier to reload, too.
44
posted on
04/14/2015 10:28:42 PM PDT
by
xander
To: Blood of Tyrants
“I doubt that the ATF will care about the subtlety.”
I have heard that a number of federal prosecutors are not taking any short barreled shotgun cases because of this mess. I do not have sources, other than it was told to me while discussing this issue at the NRA annual meeting.
It is not a crime that has a lot of prosecutions in any case.
To: Blood of Tyrants
Here is a snippet from a response to a letter to BATFE specifically asking about disposition of a homemade firearm. If you google "selling a homemade firearm" and "practical machinist" (the forum it was posted on" you will find copies of the original letter. The only thing I was unaware of was the need to mark it if sold. Other than that, as you can see, right from the horse's mouth, you can, indeed transfer to a 3rd party legally.
Also, for your information, a nonlicensee may manufacture a semiautomatic rifle for his or her own personal use. As long as the firearm remains in the custody of the person who manufactured it, the firearm need not be marked with a serial number or name and location of the manufacturer. However, if the firearm is transferred to another party at some point in the future, the firearm must be marked in accordance with the provisions set forth in 27 CFR § 478.92 (formerly 178.92).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson