“The one thing you steadfastly refuse to do:
bring facts.”
I sent you the military spec for emp shielding. You didn’t even look at it.
That is a whole 100 pages or so of facts.
Before whining further at least look at it.
Which had nothing to do with what I’m saying. The assertion is that EMP can do massive damage to civilian electronics. Which begs the question of why that wasn’t our plan in the event of nuclear war. We know NEAR the blast is a strong EMP so things that will be near it need to be hardened, but that does NOT indicated that “a couple of explosions” would reek havoc across the country. So at best you erected a strawman, yet another fallacy.