Posted on 03/31/2015 4:09:06 PM PDT by Usagi_yo
Title say's it all. Is she still licensed to practice?
What standing do you need to put that question before the appropriate Bar?
She should be TRIED in a crimial court, not just disbarred.
I’m SO tired of watching polititians commit crimes that would put ANY one of us average citizens behind bars for years - get off scot free or just a slap on the wrist.
First stop: TITLE V. DISCLOSURES AND DISCOVERY Rule 37. Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery
(e) Failure to Provide Electronically Stored Information. Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system.
Second Stop: Spoliation: The ramifications of the failure to preserve evidence
Shows proposed modifications to 37e dated sept 2014 and schedule to take effect in Dec 1 2015. Which makes things a bit clearer when regarding EI (electronic evidence).
Third stop: Center for Individual Freedom.
Representative Gowdy: Youve heard the phrase spoliation of evidence, havent you?
Commissioner Koskinen: Uhh, I cant recall ever hearing it.
Representative Gowdy: Its true of administrative hearings, civil hearings, criminal hearings.
Commissioner Koskinen: I practiced law once, 45 years ago, gave it up for Lent one year, and never went back.
Representative Gowdy: Well, let me tell you what you wouldve found if youd stuck with it. When a party has a duty to preserve evidence or records, and they fail to do so, there is a negative inference that is drawn from their failure to preserve the evidence. Its common sense, right? If you destroy something, the jury has every right to infer that whatever you destroyed would not have been good for you. Or else every litigant would destroy whatever evidence was detrimental to them, agreed? "
Fourth stop: Wikipedia
{ ... The spoliation inference is a negative evidentiary inference that a finder of fact can draw from a party's destruction of a document or thing that is relevant to an ongoing or reasonably foreseeable civil or criminal proceeding: ...}
I don’t care if they make tons of money. I do care if we get another Presidential scofflaw breaker in the Oval Office.
Disbarment would be a disaster for Hillary and it may be the only ‘low hanging fruit’ that the House could actually be successful at.
Dems are all ducks in a row awaiting their livers to be farmed.
Oh I know, that was just a part of the equation is all. Just one of many factors.
That’s interesting; Isn’t Bill disbarred ..?? I can’t remember.
So far “that woman” has managed to escape the charges and emerged stronger for it. There is no doubt that the mediots love her and protect her.
But you would think at some point their patience for this never ending drama of her being one step ahead of a criminal indictment would get old for them and that they would shout ENOUGH ! And yet here we go again.
I think at this point it’s over for Hillary. She cannot shake the stink off of her now....the allegedly “specious” charges that have accumulated over the 40+ years. When viewed int their totality, they amount to a pattern of criminality and deviousness that will be hard to dismiss.
We shall see. I am of the opinion that she will be making noises about running, doing fundraising, but in the end will just pocket the cash instead.
i thought they surrendered their licenses decades ago.
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE...
She doesn’t need her license, she does as she wants anyway...
Both Clintons are active members of Arkansas Bar. Bill was suspended for 5 years as part of a settlement back after the Paula Jones perjury deal.
It is Barack and Moochelle Obama who either gave up or lost their law licenses in Illinois. Like all their records, we cannot discern the reason why they are without law licenses, but it did not seem to bother them or their careers to date.
Anyone has standing to being an issue before the Arkansas Supreme Court for possible disciplinary investigation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.