Posted on 03/28/2015 4:19:27 PM PDT by Usagi_yo
Hillary's misfeasance is grounds for 'Spoliation of Evidence' charges vis-a-vis Benghazi.
If that's not enough, add on top the State Departments unaccounted for 6 Billion US dollars.
But we all know the fix is in. The money was used to fund secret projects that avoided all Congressional oversight. Probably slipped millions to supporters and bought some temporary friends in high places.
From the Wiki
The spoliation inference is a negative evidentiary inference that a finder of fact can draw from a party's destruction of a document or thing that is relevant to an ongoing or reasonably foreseeable civil or criminal proceeding:
More than you know.
You know, in their doddering old age, McCain and James Caan look pretty well much alike.
Most the House can do is ask the DOJ to consider criminal charges, unless current House GOP leadership is booted out.
Gowdy’s committee has very little power, and anything Gowdy knows is known by the Democrats on the committee.
It’s impossible to have an independent DOJ. The Just-us Dept has been so thoroughy corrupted that I’, not sure that the country can recover any sense of integrity.
The spiteful and bitter harridan will escape with the help of a complicit media.
Just another example that CRIME DOES PAY IN WASHINGTON, DC.
A serious Republican House leadership could force the appointment of a Special Prosecutor, although I think the current terminology is Special Counsel.
Is John McInsane marching next to the Ambassador that was murdered?
Or am I seeing things.
When the Clintons were still in Arkansas, they traded their dirty underwear for tax credits. Their dirty underwear. The Governor and First Lady of Arkansas.
How many people do you know who would trade their dirty underwear to get some tax credit? Especially when they have a good job. The Clintons did. Hillary wanted money so bad that she traded her modesty for it. She is a person who will do anything for money.
The importance Gowdy now is the Benghazi hearings.
“... reasonably foreseeable civil or criminal proceeding ...”
Leads me to believe there doesn’t have to be a subpoena in some instances, and at some point she must have been warned not to destroy evidence when the Benghazi hearings and investigations started.
That’s what I thought. I don’t know the answer.
We know nothing will happen. We have all been around this block many times with these criminals!
"Hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre / mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað." "Thought must be the harder, heart be the keener / mind must be the greater, as our might lessens." |
|
Gowdy will bark loudly a few more times and then the whole thing will just go away.
Did her husband pay any price for selling missile technology to China for campaign cash? His Bag Man is Gov. of VA.
The R and D divisions of the Uniparty make it appear there are two parties.
It’s all for entertainment.
*
“Not a chance.”
The fix is in, comrades, thank Lenin!!!
IMHO
I'd question whether shutting down the government would force this administration to appoint a Special Counsel.
They won't brook anything that might inhibit their lawlessness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.