>>I don’t think the Constitution provides a very good analogy to evolution, or any other science for that matter.
I would think University or Law school professors can teach the Constitution.
You seem to not understand that the poor teachers are the researchers themselves.<<
Woe, good non sequiteur.
The thesis is “Teachers’ can’t teach or understand TToE b/c the theory is too convoluted to be true.”
I merely note that Teacher’s can’t teach or understand the USC and our freedom so, by your definition “it is too convoluted to be true.”
Logic. Learn it. Live it. Love it.
You have a good time talking to the straw men in your head.
You are mixed up as to who is doing the poor teaching. It is the university professors who teach the classes the education students, and other students with other majors, take. These same professors are often the evolutionary scientists doing current research. I do acknowledge that there are also schools where no research is done and subjects are taught by those not actively doing research.
Evolution is quite simple to understand, but it is made a convoluted subject, very hand wavy with pseudo-complexity grafted on to give it an aura of gravitas it doesn’t merit, and is often subjective which makes it hard to teach even at the highest level of a research institution and even more so at secondary level non-research universities.
That has nothing to do with it being “false” or airplanes being built due to tornados. You do seem to be obsessed with such inanities.