Posted on 03/02/2015 5:06:19 PM PST by Sean_Anthony
Recognizing that statesmanship was replaced by political expedience long ago
There is no comparison between supporting the survival of a nation and defending another nations violent intent. One is struggling for its very life, surrounded by enemies on virtually every side. The other is a theocratic foe to western countries, expending every resource on developing methods to destroy the West.
In this scenario, why does the Leader of the Free World side with the menace rather than the underdog? We are watching the unraveling of order in the world as the Obama administration turns its back on a tried ally in favor of treating with a duplicitous regime bent on destroying the West.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
It’s cute they think he switched allegiances.
Obama is the Enemy
Also, the Germans did not vote Hitler into office (even though he was wildly popular); however, America voted the affirmative action moron into office twice. America can be so proud /sarc
Barky wants payback for America defeating his beloved USSR in the Cold War.
I agree Obama acts like Chamberlain. I think the politics ate 1 and will eat the other. The ultimate catfish bait is impeachment. Without the toxic politics of impeachment, Dems have no chance to retain the White House. They hate watching Repubs politically picking the next President. The world is a very dangerous place.
Same political story for Netanyahu. He is testing the waters to see if US will back him when he solves the problem himself by blasting the Iranian nuke sites. Question is whether or not Obama will back him up or if he can survive at going it alone.
Yea, that’s true and remembering Arial Sharon and the 6 day war...
Actually, the Germans did vote Hitler into a constitutional office. However, he then created the Reichstag fire, blamed it on the commies, and demanded unlimited executive authority to deal with the threat. The granted it for a period of one year, and the first thing he did... dissolved the German Congress..
“If Hitler would have invaded Hell, I would at least make reference in the House of Commons” Winston Churchill
There were 3 parties in Germany at the time of the election of Hitler, and he won with 38% of the vote... just pointing that out.
What really happened was Franz von Papen appointed Adolf Hitler Reich Chancellor of Germany. Shorly after that, deranged Communist, Martin Van de Lubb (sp) burned the Reichstag and Hitler cleverly used that to assume dictatorial powers. Shortly after that, a plebiscite was held in Germany on whether to approve Hitler’s actions and Hitler got a 95% JA vote. That was the vote after Hitler was appointed by von Papen. Foolish von Papen thought he could control Hitler, but Hitler outsmarted and out maneuvered him and everyone else.
The message is that it can’t happen again. Prayers for Netanyahu and Israel. This could be the birth of the 7th crusade...
” the Germans did not vote Hitler into office “
Actually the Germans did vote in the Nazi party which made Hitler head of state, right?
Then he deserved the Reichstag and took over as dictator. Exactly what Obama would love to do in America if he thought he could get away with it.
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/elect.htm
“Then he deserved the Reichstag “
meant to say desolved the Reichstag.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.