PLEASE Make YOUR Donation!
Go Monthly if you possibly and reliably can!
You Can Help Drastically Shorten FReepathons by Donating Monthly!
VERY Generous FReeper Sponsors are donating $10 for every New Monthly Donor!
Please Sign Up to Donate Monthly!
Posted on 02/04/2015 5:21:11 PM PST by IsraelBeach
By Joel Leyden
Israel News Agency
Jerusalem --- February 4, 2015 ... A newly released report at Politico says “some House Democrats are privately threatening to skip” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s March 3 address, while US Vice President Joe Biden has yet to confirm his attendance. They might want to rethink their position, as a new Rasmussen poll finds considerable public support for Netanyahu’s speech.
According to Rasmussen, voters support Netanyahu’s address to Congress over the objections of President Obama by a margin of 52 to 25%, with 23% undecided.
The poll also found 44% of voters worried that relations between the U.S. and Israel have deteriorated during Obama’s presidency, while only 9% think the relationship has grown stronger.
The overall approval numbers for Obama’s policy on Iranian nukes, the threat Netanyahu will address, looks bad for the president, 28% support, 45% disapprove. Unsurprisingly, the internals for all of these questions find strong Democrat approval and Republican disapproval for Obama, although the Republican disapproval is noticeably stronger.
Some of the popular opinions on these topics could be described as superficial — in addition to partisan loyalty, there will be many people who fail to see anything wrong with the leader of a major U.S. ally delivering a speech to Congress and either have not heard the White House’s complaints about broken protocols or consider such objections petty.
There are plenty of people who are not quite certain what to do about Iran and have either a vague sense that Obama’s policy is adequate because there haven’t been any mushroom clouds yet or a vague sense that it is inadequate because Iranian nukes are still a hot topic of debate.
Besides the perceived slight to Obama, Democrats might be nervous that Netanyahu’s speech will make hash of not only the president’s Iranian nuclear negotiations but his entire Middle East strategy.
As Rep. Robert Dold (R-IL) puts it, in a supportive piece at the Chicago Tribune:
Iran’s nuclear program is the greatest national security threat facing the United States, and it poses a real time threat to Israel. I hope that Netanyahu’s speech serves as a wake-up call about the urgency of this situation.
We would all like to have a diplomatic solution to Iran’s nuclear program. However, after a year of negotiations with the Iranians — two extensions, billions of dollars in sanctions relief, continued enrichment and research within Iran, and a hardening of demands from the opposing side — it is not clear that we are anywhere close to a successful diplomatic outcome.
Sanctions brought the regime to the negotiating table in the first place. Rewarding Tehran’s delay tactics with indefinite sanctions relief while centrifuges continue to spin weakens our hand and strengthens Iran’s — not the other way around. The swift passage of the Kirk-Menendez sanctions legislation is our best chance to help these negotiations succeed.
As for those spinning centrifuges, the Associated Press reported on Tuesday that with the “time for negotiations running short” (why would that be, exactly, if Obama’s campaign promises that Iran is a long way from nukes were true?) negotiators are looking to “break the decade-long deadlock on attempts to limit Iranian activities” that could create nuclear weapons… by working out a deal to let Iran keep its centrifuges but “reconfigure them to reduce the amount of enriched uranium they produce.”
That is a measure everyone knows is so temporary and easily reversed that it is hardly better than a symbolic gesture, a slowdown in the progress to doomsday weapons that would be measured in months.
Iran, which has been happily pocketing big-dollar sanctions concessions and deadline extensions for years, does not seem inclined to jump at this latest compromise, which is very noticeably a retreat from earlier U.S. demands.
The biggest dark cloud on Iran’s nuclear horizon is the collapse of oil prices, an event equally unexpected by Barack Obama, no matter how hard his flacks try to claim credit for engineering it. Tehran is winning this showdown with Obama, and they know it. So does Benjamin Netanyahu, and he is not shy about saying such things out loud.
Netanyahu has also been vocal in portraying Iran as the greatest Islamist threat to world peace, and not just because of their nuclear ambitions.
That’s a direct contradiction of Obama policy, which seems (to the extent that it has any real objective at all) to anticipate the rise of an Iran-dominated Shiite empire as a relatively sane Middle East hegemon the West can do business with. Netanyahu is likely to discuss that strategy in uncomfortably blunt terms, before dismissing it with even blunter terms.
As for the proximity of Netanyahu’s speech to Israeli elections, it’s not clear whether this affair has been a net plus or minus for his Likud party. Although the Politico piece says Netanyahu might have underestimated Obama’s post-midterm popularity and “miscalculated the backlash back in Israel from putting his relationship with the American President on the line,” Haaretz today finds “Likud gathering steam” and Netanyahu “widening his lead over his main rival, Isaac Herzog.”
A very effective campaign for Netanyahu is now in full swing with Support Netanyahu, a social media group on Facebook, leading the path.
Diplomatic and security issues are seen as a big asset for Netanyahu; with a small political headache being a weird story, possibly paid for by Obama V15 agents in Israel, about “corruption and hedonism at the Prime Minister’s residences,” but it is having little if no impact on the campaign.
It would seem, at the very least, that any displeasure is placed with Obama, and a backlash against Team Obama’s attempt to meddle in the Israeli elections.
Egypt
Yemen
Israel
Jordan
Saudi's, etc.........
And Bibi will make Obama seem so small.
EXCEPT at the White Hut.
It needs to be very obvious.
Can’t we trust our president to inform Congress about foreign affairs?
Like no other nation on earth, America likes real LEADERS. We root for the ambitious underdog. We look for heroes (sometimes too much even). Americans like bold, honest and genuine leaders. Also rans get ignored. Fakers get vilified and pilloried by all.
Only the media is the best indicator of how close we are to the target.
But Obama won't meet with Netanyahu when he comes here in March to speak to Congress, because it's too close to the Israeli election and Obama doesn't want to be seen as influencing the outcome.
You bet we support Netanyahu speaking to Congress!
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Democrats matter. What do American's opinions matter.
“Iran’s nuclear program is the greatest national security threat facing the United States....”
I disagree. Having Obama, the democrats and RINOs in power is the greatest national security threat facing the United States. Were it not for these corrupt traitors being in power, the Iran problem would already be resolved.
This corrupt leadership, cowards all, has taken 13 years of war and likely guaranteed a 100 year war.
Can’t we trust our president to inform Congress about foreign affairs?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you want to keep your doctor, you can keep your doctor.
Joke, right?
Hey Obama you bragged that you not only had to TALK with your allies but your enemies as well,we know what you consider Bibi as,so what’s the problem?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.