Posted on 02/02/2015 12:28:23 PM PST by rfreedom4u
“neglecting your family”
There you go again, getting personal and making assumptions
Only going by what you have posted in the past.
By attacking and vilifying those who disagree with drug use, yes they are doing that. Especially when they go off topic and attack someone personally.
Maybe not by you, but it happens all the time.
I have known and been around and lived with pot smokers for decades, I see the effects in my own life, but because I don’t want it legalized my opinion is NOT valid because I’m poor and a loser.
That is the very definition of someone who supports the use of drugs.
When I see one side of an issuing making personal insults and lying as a strategy, yes I very much side against them.
So do not tell me that is not what is happening, I am not quite that blind yet.
Nobody has been attacked or vilified just for opposing drug USE - those who also oppose adults' drug FREEDOM have been flamed.
drug freedom?
lol
Prayers for you and your family.
And 1/2 of them don't understand them.
What in the sam hill...has happened to FR????
My opinion, too many players are clued in to Hold’em. If you can play with the same people, that helps as you develop instinctive reads on them. Then you can beat the game for 3-4 BB per hour with an occasional streak of 10-20 bb per hour. But if you’re casino hopping and not developing ‘customers’ then you’ll barely break even depending upon the rake. This is a generality. Never know when you’re going to run into a pack of loose docile puppies and kittens.
PLO is a different beast altogether. Most of the people know what to play, but simply get starved for and caught up in the action and will venture out on dumb hands and over play them.
I like to short stack PLO games. It’s the best strategy for me, then I leave if I get to nosebleed levels.
That’s okay. It is now crystal clear what the intentions are — unrestricted access to drugs, kids be damned.
Or if 12 year old baby takes up the habit it must somehow be their fault. Must be abuse or maybe they are an addict, or some other excuse.
This has been very educational. Thank you.
But apparently I am the only one who noticed it and pointed out this “obvious” fact.
All I heard from the other side was that it was all her fault (or her parents), that she must be an addict or some other lame excuse for the tragedy. The kid was 12 years old when she started. A baby.
Bottom line: it was very educational for me.
Whatever twisted logic you guys come up with, what I found most telling is your response to the original post — not that it was a tragedy and that she was way underage and shouldn’t have had access to it, but that you guys attacked the victim.
Clearly your priorities are not for the safe use of pot. Because parents who blame a child first will be more tolerant of use at a younger age and may even offer it to their kids.
And I respect a person's right to whatever they want to themselves and with their lives....
As long as, and here is the kicker:
AS LONG AS WHAT THEY ARE DOING DOESN'T HURT ME, MY FAMILY, OR ANYONE ELSE. Sorry, not yelling. Not proficient with html otherwise I'd make it bold italics.
Most Libertarians seem to ignore this point.
Yea, great. By your posts, you need a lot more of it. But I'm afraid that, like hysterical leftists, you won't let reality cloud your world view. Like the reality that you lied about what I posted to feed your made-up outrage and sense of superiority. You know, like progressive do.
I'm happy I could be of service.
Lol.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.