Posted on 01/12/2015 7:28:16 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
You don’t usually here denunciations of “deranged neocons” on the red carpet at the Golden Globes, but HBO star Lena Dunham uncorked this attack on her Twitter enemies to Ryan Seacrest on the E! Network. Seacrest noted that her show “Girls” began its fourth season on Sunday night, and he asked if she would be checking for online reaction:
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
LENA DUNHAM: I deleted Twitter because I tried to create a safer space for me emotionally.
RYAN SEACREST: Explain.
DUNHAM: People threaten my life and tell me what I cow I am, so I decided....I check it occasionally but it’s not the same codependence Twitter and I once shared.
ANDREW RANNELLS: It’s a door to a whole lot of craziness.
DUNHAM: It’s the dark side of the Internet. There’s a lot of people I love on Twitter, but unfortunately you can’t read those without reading deranged neocons telling you you should be buried under a pile of rocks. Seacrest may end up on the wrong side of the PC wall for shooting back “Come on, that doesn’t happen.” Dunham replied “Get to the world, Ryan!” And she and Rannells shared a big smile.
What a repugnant beast.
STOP THAT! RIGHT NOW!
There are children present!
(((puke)))
She provides the answer to an age-old question: Is a pigs ass pork?
Yes!
Online rape by “deranged neocons”.
“: I deleted Twitter because I tried to create a safer space for me emotionally”
Leftist code for: I cut out all criticism so my made-up reality can’t be challenged.
She looks like she has dirty underpants.
I notice that a lot when it comes to “entertainment” in this country. Without even looking it up right away I said she grew up in New York city, the liberal sewerhole of the east coast, because that’s almost always where someone who questionably gets a career comes from, and gee whiz I was right. She probably got the TV series as a birthday present by some jackass who screams about the greatness of Obama until his face is beet red.
She would fail at burlesque, as the audience would shout for her to keep her clothes on.
We should really stop with the petty attacks based on her looks and weight.
It’s much more fun to attack her on the “substance” (such that it is) of what she says.
For instance, she says that “NeoCons” want her stoned to death. Very easy to tear this one apart: first, (as with her rape allegations) where’s the evidence of such having been said?
Second, “NeoCons” (IIRC) are, functionally, old Liberals who got mugged by reality and became Conservatives. They are still in many respects, social Liberals and aren’t, by definition, the old, bible-focused social Conservatives who can (in a very bigoted manner) be accused of seeing stoning as an acceptable form of punishment.
So, putting the two together it looks like she has lied about something (again) and in doing so has demonstrated complete (and, indeed, laughable) ignorance and incompetance about what she’s lying about.
with what?
“Bang her like a loose screen door in a hurricane” as the expression goes
You are a brave man Laz
She is famus for only one reason- she said the right liberal things.
They knew then that they could count on her saying disagreeable things, that would cause people to become enraged and reply back with stupidity, then they could say “SEEE???? THEY ARE HITTING US BACK!!”
She’s a pervert whose sex life has been limited to her preschool sister and rape fantasies (the fantasies reported as if they were real, harming those she called rapists). Dunham manages the near impossible task of being even less appealing on the inside than she is on the outside.
Utter (udder?) nonsense. Cows are much cuter.
Miss Dunham
I thought I had wandered over to the Muppet blog and found Miss Piggy.
Statute of limitations?
Eat mor chkin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.