Posted on 01/11/2015 10:55:48 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
Wonder no more why the Supreme Court voted for Obamacare or why New York Mayor Bill de Blasio re-appointed Brooklyn Judge Laura Johnson who freed without bail 2 defendants who had threatened police just days after the double assassination of officers in Bedford Stuyvesant.
The communist version of law is “social justice” as opposed to the rule of law. The Constitution protects the individual, whereas “social justice” protects the aims of the collective.
That is why the Communist Party began sending certain of its members to law school; to gain credibility in the courts and subvert the Constitution by distorting the intent of the law. Eventually the Party controlled the law schools themselves. And anyone trying to challenge the system will usually run headlong into a communist court. Case dismissed.
The House Un-American Activities Committee addressed the problem of communist lawyers in 1959. The main focus of their investigation was the National Lawyers Guild and notably, Yale Law.
The hearings were opened with a statement by the International Red Aid (IRA) from its Second International Conference in Moscow (1927). The Red Aid was established by the Comintern in 1922 for the purpose of providing organizations of lawyers for the legal defense of Communists and communist causes in all parts of the world.
According to the International Red Aid:
“The proletariat must gather and organize those lawyers and learned barristers in various countries who sympathize with the liberation struggle and are...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
does a mayor of a city (NYC) get to appoint judges?
that seems odd
The rioters and looters in Ferguson are right. The so called “justice system” in this country is in serious need of some “comprehensive reform” for ALL AMERICANS. The “judges” and “lawyers” are out of control.
Traitor Roberts is a Commie?
Just part of the Mystery of Iniquity.
Only to the New York City Criminal Court, a low level court which hears only misdemeanor cases (and some preliminary hearings in felony cases). And the Mayor's appointments must be from a list of candidates approved by a judicial nominating commission.
Felony cases in New York are heard by the "Supreme Court" (a misnomer, since it's not the state's highest court-- it's equivalent to what most states call the "Superior Court"), whose judges are elected.
i see.
thanks!
I’d be ok with a mayor appointing a traffic (infractions) commissioner. I am not comfy with a mayor appointing anybody who can put citizens in jail, whether on misdemeanor or felony charges.
just my POV. thanks for the info!
(Declared)Commies can't win elections. So infiltrated everything and win from the inside.
Game over.
In many states, the Governor appoints all the judges. New York City has a population of 8.4 million, which is larger than all but 11 states.
That is why the Communist Party began sending certain of its members to law school.
Lawyer Obama has sealed records wonder why?.
/s
its up to New York’s citizens, not me to decide such a question
It just sounded odd is all, especially in light of NYC’s history of corrupt city govts, so I asked
thanks!
The actual name of the committee was the House Committee On Un-American Activities. The use of the term House Un-American Activities Committee was designed to make the group’s actions seem “Un American.”
Let’s examine Judge Laura Johnson’s actions in the context of the 14th Amendment’s (14A) Equal Protections Clause (EPC). The OP of this thread provides excellent support, imo, for explaining how John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of 14A where the EPC is found, had intended for that clause to be understood.
More specifically, instead of judges applying laws equally to all offenders and defenders, activist justices and judges are either interpreting laws differently, or ignoring them altogether for certain offenders and defendants.
Ironically, this is evidenced by judges now wrongly using the EPC itself as an excuse to argue that legitimate, 10th Amendment-protected state laws prohibiting constitutionally unprotected gay marriage are unconstitutional.
Noting that Bingham had been judge, he was undoubtedly well aware of the temptation of judges to legislate both political and special interest agendas from the bench.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.