Posted on 11/28/2014 9:41:17 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
Two realities are sinking into the psyche of the Democrat Party: They have no valuable ideas and the few ideas they were able to turn into law dont work.
Reasonable people would be embarrassed. They would stand up and walk away from the table, after reaching these conclusions; but the Democrats are not reasonable people. It is impossible to embarrass them. They have always been about getting and holding power and nothing else.
Last week top Democrat New York Senator Chuck Schumer admitted that he and his Party made a mistake by passing Obamacare when they did. Of course he didnt say Obamacare itself was a mistake; Democrats are incapable of saying such a thing.
Nevertheless, what Schumer let slip is a window into the web of lies he, his Party and their stooges in the media crafted about our economic recovery. Schumer said, We were in the middle of recession. People were hurting and said What about me? Im losing my job,
Remember these liars have been insisting that Barack Obamas recession ended in July 2009 some five months before they illegally rammed Obamacare down our throats with a 1 AM vote just before their Christmas break. Speaking last week, Obama admitted his executive order granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens was unconstitutional.
So Obamacare was a mistake and Obamas amnesty is actually unconstitutional, voter fraud didnt work because the Republican victory margins were much too big to pull it off. The IRS, Fast and Furious and Benghazi scandals are...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Bump
The faces of the democratic party now are Obama, Sharpton, Holder, Jesse Jackson, and child rapist Terry Bean.
Whatever happened to those hi-tech crowd control weapons, like frying them with microwaves?
As Ann Coulter said the left is using black blood to further their agenda.
“Now we have to put our foot on their necks and keep them down.”
That could lead to rabies or worse.
And our enemies can all watch it on CNN. Sickening.
Instead chant: "PANTS UP, DON'T LOOT!!!"
Almost immediately after Mike Brown was shot, a “Community organizer”/politician (named something ...Shahid, indicating Mooslimness) arrived on the scene. Shahid appears in many photos to be working among precisely the set of “witnesses” who then lied to the cameras about “hands up”, “Brown was shot in the back”, etc. The GJ witnesses who did not interact with this group mostly seemed to corroborate Wilson’s version of events and the physical evidence.
Why was Shahid there so quickly? Police scanner? Someone call him? Random chance?
Did he arrive already aggrieved, with an plan to graft onto an available incident, complete with the “hands up” meme and gesture package? (I.e, any evidence he had used similar lines before?)
Was he in contact with Obama operatives (CRS, Democratic Party, CAIR/Islamic or Communist groups) BEFORE Brown was shot, as part of the election cycle and pushing a broader “racial justice” agenda?
Just wondering...
What they have left is prisons full of violent criminals many of which should have been exterminated but now live only as insurance that taxpayers will keep forking over mountains of money and resources to keep them away from polite society.
There is nothing I despise more than Democrats. There are some things I despise as MUCH as Democrats, but nothing MORE than Democrats.
I am proud that they hate me because I am a white heterosexual male, a veteran, a traditionalist and a conservative.
You nailed it, FRiend!
The only thing the demoncraps know how to do is to tear stuff down.
Just like their daddy Satan.
How is that any different from white supremacist groups? I recall how the SPLC used civil lawsuites against white supremacist groups.
What are Obama-Holder demagogues, the Sharpton race-grievance industry, and many MSM employees if not supremacists? People harmed by the hate and violence should sue.
The Obama-Holder demagogues, the Sharpton race-grievance industry, and many MSM employees should be sued for their lies that caused harm to others. I gathered this from Internet sources and I recall how SPLC used it against white supremacist groups.
Traditional principles of vicarious liability include
Though associated with criminal law, these theories can be used to attribute fault to persons not directly related to an act that harmed a victim.
It must be proved that the others 'provided substantial assistance or encouragement' to those who did harm the victim.
In the SPLC suit against Tom Metzger and WAR the skinheads were not members of Metzger's WAR. But Metzger's rantings had influence over the mindless skinheads due to his reputation in the white supremacy movement
Tom Metzger recruited 16-year-old Mazzella and schooled him in the world of racist violence. Mazzella was sent to Portland to join up with and train the East Side White Pride [skinheads]. Members of that group later brutally murdered an innocent black man.
How is that any different that being "recruited" in college or by progressive ideologues?
The aiding and abetting theory fits because
Lawyers can invoke the aiding and abetting theory with relative ease. Invoking the aiding and abetting assumes two independent actors.
To prove an aiding and abetting claim
Civil conspiracy was also used and proved against the Metzgers because he had contacted the East Side White Pride skinheads and after the murder and their arrest one skinhead called Metzger from jail. Here civil conspiracy might be proved by any contacts between the criminals and Sharpton, Holder, Obama, et al.
Obviously I am not a lawyer and this is a kind of an outline of information available on the Internet. Why can't it be used against the "progressives" and racists of all colors?
Amen :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.