Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Impala64ssa
The U.S. has not implemented a similar ban because of First Amendment considerations, even in the face of escalating threats from radical Islamists.

Islam doctrinally intends to subvert the Constitution, using "free exercise" for themselves to destroy it for everybody else. They are therefore not a party to the social contract that is the Constitution, choosing not to allow others equal status before the law among "we the people." They are therefore undeserving of Constitutional protections.

39 posted on 10/22/2014 10:00:36 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Take the chip and let them hack your brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

Exactly. Their “reliqious” belief is that nobody but Muslims have any riqhts whatsoever, and their mission in life is to do whatever it takes to make it so that the qovernment under which they live enforces that worldview. The “reliqion” is actually an enemy of everythinq the US Constitution stands for.


55 posted on 10/23/2014 7:33:23 AM PDT by butterdezillion (Note to self : put this between arrow keys: img src=""/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson