[EveningStar]

The article is a rebuttal to the material presented in this thread: There Are No Such Things As Black Holes

[who_would_fardels_bear]

This is not a rebuttal. I don't know anywhere where she claimed that GR was false. All she claimed was that Hawking Radiation occurred throughout the life of a Black Hole and not just after it was established.

I think it's a better result that no nonsensical singularities exist in our universe than that an essential part of how our universe is constructed and evolves is due to the behavior of singularities, i.e. objects that don't behave according to any law known to science.

Certainly we have theories that can be used to predict what will happen to objects that come within the vicinity of Black Holes, but they are a key reason why GR and QM have not yet been united into a single coherent theory.

The idiot who wrote the "rebuttal" is extremely rude and abusive. What is he trying to hide? Maybe he needs to find a Black Hole to crawl into.

[arthurus]

The article is not a rebuttal. It is name calling. I, however, don’t think the targets of the name calling hold any water or quarks or anything else. The new theoroids have not had any experiments to prove or disprove them and so are not established beyond assertion.

[super7man]

Yeah, but where does the Ford Pinto come come out all this?