Ruth Bader Ginsburg Really Wants Poor People To Stop Having Babies

The Federalist ^ | 09/24/2014 | Mollie Hemingway

[Da Coyote]

There really is no lower limit to the inner ugliness of liberals.

And Ruth Buzzi Ginzburg pretty much defines the IQ lower limit that one can have and still maintain life functions.

Such is the legacy of liberals.

Gads, these people are stupid beyond comprehension.

[A_Former_Democrat]

I’m actually kinda surprised they feel this way, given their voting support, welfare state and Cloward-Piven strategy

I’d think they would want the white middle class done away with.

Unless they’re thinking ahead of the demographics for their own brats and grandbrats.

[Slyfox]

These are the same people who are kissing the feet of terrorists and illegal aliens and imploring them to move here so they can insure their road to their utopia is not blocked.

But, little human babies are persona non grata?

WTF!?

[zipper]

She’s 81 years old — Zeke Emanuel says that’s about 6 years beyond her expiration date.

Still, I want Ruth Busby to hold on until we can elect a Republican president. We wouldn’t want Obama appointing a younger version of Ruth Busby in the meantime.

[Rusty0604]

And they are importing thousands of uneducated poor kids from Central America. How does that make any sense to the liberal?

[sheana]

It makes no sense as a national policy to promote birth only among poor people

I actually agree with her if it is done via the welfare state.
And no, I am not making a pro abortion statement. I am saying if we didn’t promote everyone having babies under the welfare state they might wait til they could afford them and not make me take care of them.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

That’s always puzzled me, too. If Socialists are SO pro-abortion and against life in pretty much any form (So long, Grandpa, you useless feeder!) how are they still around? Why haven’t they aborted themselves out of existence?

Is it that pesky, ‘Rights for me, but NOT for thee,’ thang?

They are despicable. I wish I could be a fly on St. Peter’s gate. DENIED!

[Rusty0604]

And we shouldn’t have to pay for their abortions either. Maybe some of them would learn to abstain or at least use a contraceptive.

[jonno]

...6 years beyond her expiration date...

Well - that explains alot...

[sheana]

Agree. We shouldn’t be forced to pay for either.

[Vendome]

In this instance, she actually makes sense.

/S

[Vendome]

Have a friend who has private jet money.

Turns 80 in a year.

He employs quite a few people and his businesses are multimillion enterprises that also pay a gazillion in taxes.

I will be uunhapy whe he leaves this rock.

Nicest and kindest man I ever met.

Generous to a fault and thinks nothing if it.

Just who he is.

[Opinionated Blowhard]

and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of

Margaret Sanger, call your office!

[TBP]

This is pure eugenics on her part, but there is a valid point in saying that people should stop having babies with no fathers, living on the public dole, and then creating more babies. This contributes to the instituionalization of poverty.

[LucianOfSamasota]

Just looking at Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would prevent me from starting babies...

So maybe she’s the solution to her own dilemma?

[Fledermaus]

I’m for abortion if it wipes out “those we don’t want anymore of” - LIBERALS!! Take than Ruth Buzzie

[Bratch]

Does she really think folks are going to stop having babies when the government provides a stipend every time they pop a bun out of the oven?

She evidently wasn't paying attention the day the teacher discussed Pavlov.

[caww]

...."people should stop having babies with no fathers, living on the public dole, and then creating more babies. This contributes to the instituionalization of poverty".....

They don't see a lifestyle on welfare as poverty...in fact they do very well....why do otherwise if you can get it all on welfare?

[caww]