To: marktwain
How is it that we are given to vote on what the Constitution already guarantees without infringement?
3 posted on
07/21/2014 8:23:32 PM PDT by
Fester Chugabrew
(Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
To: Fester Chugabrew
How is it that we are given to vote on what the Constitution already guarantees without infringement? The liberal elites do not consider the Constitution to be "settled law."
5 posted on
07/21/2014 8:29:49 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
To: Fester Chugabrew
6 posted on
07/21/2014 8:31:26 PM PDT by
deadrock
(I am someone else.)
To: Fester Chugabrew
If you read the amendment, you see that it takes out the power of the legislature to regulate concealed carry, it includes ammunition and accessories as protected; and it clarifies that the right is unalienable and that the court must use a “strict scrutiny” standard.
These are improvements.
7 posted on
07/21/2014 8:32:22 PM PDT by
marktwain
(The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
To: Fester Chugabrew
It is added protection. The courts can look the Bill of Rights in the face and ignore them as we have found out. It hems the government in even more.
8 posted on
07/21/2014 8:33:08 PM PDT by
taterjay
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson