We can explain the existence of humans just fine. And we don’t need a moral basis for equality of rights, we have a practical basis. Equal rights maximizes your society’s output, because you have more people in a position to contribute to the full extent of their ability. The more of your society that gets deliberately held back the less of your society that is producing and inventing and just generally supporting it. There was a great article about a decade ago talking about how Islamic treatment of women holds their society back, by telling over half their society no when it comes to pretty much everything they’ve turned half their society into deadweight, they have specifically outlawed Madame Curie and Lady Ada.
Equal rights is just plain good business.
So, you don’t really care about the rights of others, as any sort of moral imperative, but only because you believe it will serve your own utilitarian self-interest.
I mean, why else would you care about “society”?
How about the rights of those who aren’t “in a position to contribute to the full extent of their ability”?
How about the rights of those who cannot contribute anything at all?
Are they disposable?
Why not?
What if it becomes "bad business," ie, like Malthus, you think we have too many people, which is therefore a detriment to what you call "society"?
Maybe but that is not biblical.
Luke 12
From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked.
We can?
Do so.
Tell us all step by step how they came to be starting from the big bang.
Demonstrate your hypothesis.