Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CPOSharky

I suppose “him or her” or “the other invader” could have been used. “It” seems inappropriate.

What would you suggest?


10 posted on 07/14/2014 7:42:44 AM PDT by marktwain (The old media must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain
Standard English language usage specifies "he","him", "his" etc for singular human beings of unknown sex. The sentence would properly read:

We do not know if the third was hit because the police have not found them him yet.

Feminazi stupidity to the contrary notwithstanding, the use of "him" in this context does not imply that the missing suspect is definitively male, but that the missing suspect's sex is unknown.

BTW, missing suspects (and other people) do not have "gender". They have "sex". Their sex is either male or female. Gender is a property of words: either masculine, feminine or neuter.

I despise political correctness.

11 posted on 07/14/2014 7:50:06 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Oh, yes:

That was good shooting by the homeowner. Definitely hit two of the three enemy, may have hit the third as well. It’s a fine example of gun control.


12 posted on 07/14/2014 7:51:24 AM PDT by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson