Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Get Cliven Bundy!: Openly Gay Adam Nagourney of the NYTimes Crafts An Anti-Bundy Hitpiece
April 24, 2014 | me

Posted on 04/24/2014 8:21:40 AM PDT by kiryandil

Adam Nagourney of New York Times, who has been a "deadbeat journalist" since before the Clinton impeachment wars, apparently got his marching orders from somewhere to produce a hit piece on Cliven Bundy.

Nagourney, who fought on the side of the Clinton media forces back in 1998-1999, comes out smearing:

...Mr. Bundy’s standoff with federal rangers — propelled into the national spotlight in part by steady coverage by Fox News...

Since national politicians have started to come out on the side of Cliven, it appears that the government thugs who are after Cliven Bundy needed to do something to isolate Bundy.

Nagourney, a notorious, longtime Lefty hack "journalist", appeared to fill the bill. He sets the stage for the killshot on Bundy with a paragraph or two, then cuts right to the chase with a shrill, amplified Lefty dog whistle:

CLIVEN BUNDY IS A RACIST!!!

Nagourney then cuts to the politicians furiously backing away.

Mission Accomplished, in 12 paragraphs. Nagourney's many years as a mercenary propagandist for the Left pays off.

The rest of the "article" was phoned in, because Nagourney knew his primary purpose was fulfilled.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: adamnagourney; blm; bundy; bundyracist; bundyranch; deadbeatjournalist; nyt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: mcgoober

I have yet to see same..


61 posted on 04/24/2014 11:49:58 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey ( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

It was MovieShopped.


62 posted on 04/24/2014 1:58:19 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

They MovieShopped it.


63 posted on 04/24/2014 2:08:19 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

I said this on another site. I’ll post it here.

“Harry Reid is the problem if you’ve been paying attention. And not some plain spoken man because he said something absence of malice. A man that didn’t play by the contemporary PC rules set up by liberals, and he not knowing the world has left-shifted beneath him. You’re the one using deflection from the real issues.

Furthermore, you think the company size group of men are going to leave Bundy anytime soon because the liberal press plays dishonest, propaganda, gotcha-games so a large group of federally armed men can take him by force? I doubt it.

So what’s next?

Judge Napolitano gave an easy and reasonable solution: file an injunction in the local courts to put a lien on his property when Bundy sells the land or before inheritance. So why not do this Snip? Why is the Obama/Reid government so head long to use violence to take Bundy by force?

Now, a court injunction doesn’t work for Harry Reid does it because that could take decades. Old Harry maybe 6 feet under in the mean time, and where his hidden crooked deals gets nixed. No fun for the megalomaniac and power tripping hungry.

So is Reid and Obama going to send in an estimated battalion sized group against a company of motivated men protecting Bundy from an overreaching and immoral government? - Which would lead to disasters on so many levels.

I’ll give you some clues. You’ll immediately lose the propaganda battle against Bundy. How many more armed men would take up arms against the government because of an unjust and immoral government’s use of power. Just extrapolate the poll numbers that you see above on this thread. How many causalities would result from government violent action here? The Feds could take 15 to 20% causalities if the armed militia leadership protecting Bundy can walk and chew gum at the same time. Are the Feds who would carry out such orders crazy enough to risk it - risk their lives? For what? Reid and Obama’s craziness and for turtles? Totally nuts. “


64 posted on 04/24/2014 4:06:58 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
I don't think Reid was the problem at all in 1993, 1999, at the time of the first District Court order, or when the BLM was sending its letters. Late 2013 legal action? Timing sounds suspiciously like Harry Reid.

Until now, the BLM has gone out of its way not to take action against Bundy. It can't be that the BLM was scared. The BLM won every legal battle against Bundy, and the 9th Circuit was on the side of the BLM. The BLM could have sought a lien for years when Reid wasn't involved.

Why now? Reid seems the best answer. Why the unjust and excessive display of force? Forty-seven police officers showed up to take down a drunk, 60+ year-old man in Albuquerque. Federal agencies, except the CDC, now have their own SWAT forces. The feds used tanks at Waco. I may have been more surprised if the feds or local law enforcement didn't show excessive military force.

65 posted on 04/24/2014 4:49:27 PM PDT by Scoutmaster (I'd rather be at Philmont)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

Right, Reid’s interests in the land is likely a recent development probably in the last few years.


66 posted on 04/24/2014 6:22:18 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: deport
Hannity is a low class opportunist, exploiting this guy for ratings and then bailing the minute somebody said Negro.

I never saw an interview Wonder Boy did with Bundy that didn't make me question why he was sacrificing this guy up for ratings.

Desperation much Sean?

67 posted on 04/24/2014 6:29:57 PM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson