Get Cliven Bundy!: Openly Gay Adam Nagourney of the NYTimes Crafts An Anti-Bundy Hitpiece

April 24, 2014 | me

[MeshugeMikey]

I have yet to see same..

[Lazamataz]

It was MovieShopped.

[Lazamataz]

They MovieShopped it.

[Red Steel]

I said this on another site. I’ll post it here.

“Harry Reid is the problem if you’ve been paying attention. And not some plain spoken man because he said something absence of malice. A man that didn’t play by the contemporary PC rules set up by liberals, and he not knowing the world has left-shifted beneath him. You’re the one using deflection from the real issues.

Furthermore, you think the company size group of men are going to leave Bundy anytime soon because the liberal press plays dishonest, propaganda, gotcha-games so a large group of federally armed men can take him by force? I doubt it.

So what’s next?

Judge Napolitano gave an easy and reasonable solution: file an injunction in the local courts to put a lien on his property when Bundy sells the land or before inheritance. So why not do this Snip? Why is the Obama/Reid government so head long to use violence to take Bundy by force?

Now, a court injunction doesn’t work for Harry Reid does it because that could take decades. Old Harry maybe 6 feet under in the mean time, and where his hidden crooked deals gets nixed. No fun for the megalomaniac and power tripping hungry.

So is Reid and Obama going to send in an estimated battalion sized group against a company of motivated men protecting Bundy from an overreaching and immoral government? - Which would lead to disasters on so many levels.

I’ll give you some clues. You’ll immediately lose the propaganda battle against Bundy. How many more armed men would take up arms against the government because of an unjust and immoral government’s use of power. Just extrapolate the poll numbers that you see above on this thread. How many causalities would result from government violent action here? The Feds could take 15 to 20% causalities if the armed militia leadership protecting Bundy can walk and chew gum at the same time. Are the Feds who would carry out such orders crazy enough to risk it - risk their lives? For what? Reid and Obama’s craziness and for turtles? Totally nuts. “

[Scoutmaster]

I don't think Reid was the problem at all in 1993, 1999, at the time of the first District Court order, or when the BLM was sending its letters. Late 2013 legal action? Timing sounds suspiciously like Harry Reid.

Until now, the BLM has gone out of its way not to take action against Bundy. It can't be that the BLM was scared. The BLM won every legal battle against Bundy, and the 9th Circuit was on the side of the BLM. The BLM could have sought a lien for years when Reid wasn't involved.

Why now? Reid seems the best answer. Why the unjust and excessive display of force? Forty-seven police officers showed up to take down a drunk, 60+ year-old man in Albuquerque. Federal agencies, except the CDC, now have their own SWAT forces. The feds used tanks at Waco. I may have been more surprised if the feds or local law enforcement didn't show excessive military force.

[Red Steel]

Right, Reid’s interests in the land is likely a recent development probably in the last few years.

[Rome2000]

Hannity is a low class opportunist, exploiting this guy for ratings and then bailing the minute somebody said Negro.

I never saw an interview Wonder Boy did with Bundy that didn't make me question why he was sacrificing this guy up for ratings.

Desperation much Sean?